Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ActiveBatch and JAMS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Astro by Astronomer
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
SFTP To Go
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (47.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
$9,996.00 Per Year
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(213)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatchJAMS
Star Rating
(219)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$9,996.00 Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that JAMS Enterprise Job Scheduler excels in workflow automation with a score of 9.5, highlighting its ability to streamline complex processes effectively, while ActiveBatch Workload Automation, with a score of 9.2, is noted for its robust workflow management capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that JAMS offers superior error alerts functionality, scoring 9.3, which helps users quickly identify and resolve issues, whereas ActiveBatch's score of 9.0 indicates a solid but slightly less responsive alert system.
- G2 users highlight JAMS' strong quality of support with a score of 9.5, often praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while ActiveBatch's support, rated at 8.9, is considered good but not as consistently praised.
- Users on G2 report that ActiveBatch shines in integrations, scoring 9.1, with many reviewers appreciating its seamless connectivity with third-party applications, while JAMS, with a score of 8.3, is seen as having fewer integration options.
- Reviewers mention that JAMS provides excellent job scheduling features, scoring 9.4, which users find intuitive and effective for managing tasks, while ActiveBatch leads slightly with a score of 9.6, noted for its advanced scheduling capabilities.
- Users say that ActiveBatch's intelligent automation features, scoring 9.1, are particularly beneficial for organizations looking to enhance efficiency, while JAMS, with a score of 8.6, is seen as less advanced in this area, focusing more on traditional automation methods.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
- Ease of use - connect to your entire tech stack with our low-code API adapter and no-code connectors for SQL Server, SharePoint, Informatica, ServiceNow, VMware and more.
- Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, change management, auto-remediation and a complete managed transfer file suite.
- Monitoring, alerting and reporting - reduce time troubleshooting and manage dependencies better with flexible and customizable monitoring and alerting.
JAMS
Core
$9,996.00
Per Year
Perfect for small teams getting started with automation.
Core Integrations: PowerShell, SQL, Azure Data Factory, Python, & 20+ others.
- Full IT and data orchestration
- Cross-platform job scheduling
- Advanced workflow automation
Free Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
JAMS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
163
9.1
171
Ease of Use
8.8
161
8.6
173
Ease of Setup
8.4
112
8.5
138
Ease of Admin
8.7
101
8.6
110
Quality of Support
8.9
155
9.3
166
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
99
9.2
109
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
150
9.1
166
Features by Category
Automation
9.3
98
8.9
150
9.0
92
8.9
135
9.1
57
Feature Not Available
Administration
9.0
96
8.5
145
9.2
90
8.5
132
8.9
75
8.4
118
9.0
55
Feature Not Available
9.1
58
8.6
80
9.1
52
8.9
75
Functionality
9.5
100
9.3
141
8.7
77
8.4
112
9.0
50
8.1
74
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
6.7
16
Not enough data
7.0
17
Not enough data
6.9
16
Not enough data
7.0
16
Not enough data
6.7
16
Not enough data
6.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
15
Data Delivery
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
Governance
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
18
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch and JAMS are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
ActiveBatch is categorized as Data Warehouse Automation, Managed File Transfer (MFT), and Process Orchestration
JAMS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
JAMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.0%
Financial Services
17.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.6%
Insurance
6.6%
Banking
6.2%
Other
44.5%
Financial Services
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Insurance
6.9%
Banking
4.6%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
59.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
Can JAMS convert my existing batch jobs?
2 Comments
Official Response from JAMS
Yes. Conversion utilities for Windows Task Scheduler, SQL Server Agent, and Cron are included with JAMS.Read more
How to hold schedules of all the jobs ?
2 Comments
AC
JAMS has the option to use jobs to execute other jobs in a specific order, which allows you to hold schedules for all jobs.Read more
What is a JAMS Job?
2 Comments
RG
A JAMS job is a definition for a task to be performed. It can be triggered by the appearance of a file at a certain location, an email receipt, a date/time...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
