Compare ActiveBatch and JAMS

Save your comparisonKeep these tools in one place and come back anytime.
Save to board
At a Glance
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(226)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatch
JAMS
JAMS
Star Rating
(244)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$9,996.00 Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that JAMS excels in providing detailed reports and strong automation capabilities, which users find particularly beneficial for detecting and resolving issues. One user highlighted the tool's ability to standardize SQL Server maintenance, making it easier for IT personnel to manage tasks efficiently.
  • Users say that ActiveBatch stands out for its structured approach to background processes, which enhances operational uniformity. Reviewers appreciate how it automates critical IT tasks like database backups and report generation, allowing for reliable execution without constant monitoring.
  • According to verified reviews, JAMS receives high marks for its user-friendly visual interface and notification management, making it accessible even for non-technical users. This ease of use is a significant advantage for teams looking to streamline their workflow across multiple systems.
  • Reviewers mention that ActiveBatch enhances accountability within IT teams by assigning ownership to each planned procedure and maintaining a recorded history. This feature helps reduce confusion during shift changes, which is a common challenge in many organizations.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that JAMS offers a quick implementation process, with users noting the intuitive onboarding experience. This can be a crucial factor for teams needing to get up and running swiftly without extensive training.
  • Users report that while JAMS has a slight edge in overall satisfaction, ActiveBatch's features for job scheduling and cross-system integration are particularly robust, making it a strong contender for enterprises with complex automation needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
Learn more about ActiveBatch
JAMS
Core
$9,996.00
Per Year
Browse all 2 pricing plans
Free Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
JAMS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
176
9.0
191
Ease of Use
8.9
174
8.6
193
Ease of Setup
8.4
125
8.5
158
Ease of Admin
8.7
103
8.6
114
Quality of Support
8.9
168
9.3
186
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
101
9.1
113
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
163
9.0
186
Features by Category
9.0
125
8.1
175
Automation
9.4
103
9.0
156
9.0
95
8.8
144
9.1
56
Feature Not Available
Administration
8.8
100
8.5
153
9.1
98
8.5
142
8.9
77
8.5
125
9.0
55
Feature Not Available
9.1
62
8.7
91
9.1
53
8.8
82
Functionality
9.6
113
9.3
160
8.8
84
8.4
120
9.1
57
8.1
83
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
8.9
12
7.5
25
7.4
9
7.4
26
9.5
10
7.4
29
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
7.0
22
Not enough data
7.2
21
Not enough data
7.6
21
Managed File Transfer (MFT)Hide 26 FeaturesShow 26 Features
8.8
67
Not enough data
Data Delivery
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
35
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
Governance
8.9
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
35
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.9
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Warehouse AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
9.1
28
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
Functionality
8.7
19
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.2
22
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
JAMS
JAMS
ActiveBatch and JAMS are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
JAMS
JAMS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
40.2%
JAMS
JAMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
21.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
47.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
31.6%
Reviewers' Industry
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Information Technology and Services
18.8%
Financial Services
16.5%
Hospital & Health Care
7.1%
Insurance
6.3%
Banking
5.8%
Other
45.5%
JAMS
JAMS
Financial Services
17.4%
Information Technology and Services
8.1%
Insurance
6.4%
Computer Software
4.7%
Banking
4.2%
Other
59.3%
Alternatives
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch Alternatives
Stonebranch
Stonebranch
Add Stonebranch
GoAnywhere MFT
GoAnywhere MFT
Add GoAnywhere MFT
Control-M
Control-M
Add Control-M
Progress MOVEit
Progress MOVEit
Add Progress MOVEit
JAMS
JAMS Alternatives
Control-M
Control-M
Add Control-M
Stonebranch
Stonebranch
Add Stonebranch
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs
Add RunMyJobs
Automic Automation
Automic Automation
Add Automic Automation
Discussions
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
Nazeer A.
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
Katti W.
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
JAMS
JAMS Discussions
What is Enterprise Scheduling?
2 Comments
Rob G.
RG
Enterprise scheduling is the concept of using a centralized job scheduling platform to coordinate the execution of tasks across multiple systems within a...Read more
What is a JAMS Job?
2 Comments
Rob G.
RG
A JAMS job is a definition for a task to be performed. It can be triggered by the appearance of a file at a certain location, an email receipt, a date/time...Read more
How to hold schedules of all the jobs ?
2 Comments
Kevin V.
KV
Hi Rajesh, This is attainable by creating a maintenance window in JAMS. Please see the following KB:...Read more