# Top 10 Cone Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.9/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 34 The Proposal Software solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with Cone. Proposal Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking simple, reliable software solutions with engagement tracking, proposal effectiveness reporting, and cpq integration. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Cone include customer service and templates. The best overall Cone alternative is PandaDoc. Other similar apps like Cone are Proposify, TaxDome, Jotform Sign, and Nintex. Cone alternatives can be found in [Proposal Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) but may also be in [Tax Practice Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/tax-practice-management) or [E-Signature Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/e-signature). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Cone - [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) - [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) - [TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/products/taxdome/reviews) - [Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/products/jotform-sign/reviews) - [Nintex](https://www.g2.com/products/nintex-nintex/reviews) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews) - [GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/products/getaccept/reviews) - [Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/products/qwilr/reviews) - [Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/products/conga-composer/reviews) - [Karbon](https://www.g2.com/products/karbon-2025-03-03/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to Cone Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Cone stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Accounting, Consulting, and Design, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) By PandaDoc **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 3,596 PandaDoc is an app that lets you build, track, and sign your docs all in one place. Automate your workflow, discover what sells with built-in analytics, and get legally binding signatures in minutes. Reviewers say compared to Cone, PandaDoc is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive - Easier to admin Categories in common with Cone: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Cone vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-pandadoc) **Compare PandaDoc with other alternatives:** - [PandaDoc vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-proposify) - [PandaDoc vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-taxdome) - [PandaDoc vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-pandadoc) - [PandaDoc vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-pandadoc) - [PandaDoc vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [PandaDoc vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-pandadoc) - [PandaDoc vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-qwilr) - [PandaDoc vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-pandadoc) - [PandaDoc vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-pandadoc) ### 2. [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) By Proposify **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,138 Proposify proposal software helps growing teams remove document bottlenecks, and get visibility into the most important stage of your sales cycle: the close. Reviewers say compared to Cone, Proposify is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive - Easier to admin Categories in common with Cone: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Cone vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-proposify) **Compare Proposify with other alternatives:** - [Proposify vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-taxdome) - [Proposify vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Proposify vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-qwilr) - [Proposify vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-proposify) - [Proposify vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-proposify) ### 3. [TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/products/taxdome/reviews) By TaxDome **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 701 TaxDome combines all of your business tasks and operations into one centralized hub that is easily accessible from anywhere. Reviewers say compared to Cone, TaxDome is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Cone: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal), [Accounting Practice Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/accounting-practice-management) **Compare:** [Cone vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-taxdome) **Compare TaxDome with other alternatives:** - [TaxDome vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-taxdome) - [TaxDome vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-taxdome) - [TaxDome vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-taxdome) - [TaxDome vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-taxdome) - [TaxDome vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/responsive-formerly-rfpio-vs-taxdome) - [TaxDome vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-taxdome) - [TaxDome vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/qwilr-vs-taxdome) - [TaxDome vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-taxdome) - [TaxDome vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-taxdome) ### 4. [Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/products/jotform-sign/reviews) By Jotform **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,754 Jotform Sign is a powerful e-signature platform that combines digital signatures with built-in automation to streamline document workflows. Easily create, share, and collect legally binding e-signatures on any device — without writing a single line of code. Upload an existing PDF, choose from 800+ professionally designed templates, or build a custom document from scratch using Jotform’s intuitive drag-and-drop document builder. Designed for maximum flexibility, Jotform Sign is ideal for waivers, consent forms, lease agreements, sales contracts, onboarding documents, and any workflow that requires secure signatures. Customize every part of your document to match your brand by uploading your logo, selecting fonts and colors, and adjusting layout elements. You can also add multiple signers, define a step-by-step automated signing order, set access permissions, and personalize your email notifications. These automation tools help reduce manual tasks, prevent bottlenecks, and accelerate approval cycles. Jotform Sign works seamlessly across devices, so recipients can review and sign documents from their phone, tablet, or laptop with a smooth, user-friendly experience. Each document includes a detailed audit trail, ensuring compliance, transparency, and trustworthy record-keeping. Whether you’re handling waivers, agreements, contracts, consent forms, or internal approvals, Jotform Sign automates repetitive tasks and eliminates the slow, outdated steps of paper-based processes. All signed documents are securely stored and can be easily exported, organized, shared, or integrated with your existing workflows. By combining digital signatures with automation, Jotform Sign helps businesses reduce turnaround times, improve accuracy, and enhance the signing experience for clients, employees, and partners. Say goodbye to scanning, printing, and manual follow-ups — and manage your entire signature workflow online with a fast, modern, and reliable e-signature platform. Reviewers say compared to Cone, Jotform Sign is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive - Easier to admin Categories in common with Cone: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Cone vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-jotform-sign) **Compare Jotform Sign with other alternatives:** - [Jotform Sign vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-pandadoc) - [Jotform Sign vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-proposify) - [Jotform Sign vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-taxdome) - [Jotform Sign vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-nintex-nintex) - [Jotform Sign vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Jotform Sign vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-jotform-sign) - [Jotform Sign vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-qwilr) - [Jotform Sign vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-jotform-sign) - [Jotform Sign vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-karbon-2025-03-03) ### 5. [Nintex](https://www.g2.com/products/nintex-nintex/reviews) By Nintex **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,322 The Nintex Platform empowers organizations to digitally transform their business with intelligent process automation technologies. Reviewers say compared to Cone, Nintex is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Cone: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Cone vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-nintex-nintex) **Compare Nintex with other alternatives:** - [Nintex vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-pandadoc) - [Nintex vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-proposify) - [Nintex vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-taxdome) - [Nintex vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-nintex-nintex) - [Nintex vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Nintex vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-nintex-nintex) - [Nintex vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-qwilr) - [Nintex vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-nintex-nintex) - [Nintex vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-nintex-nintex) ### 6. [Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews) By Responsive **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,309 Responsive is a cloud-based RFP software that eliminates the friction often associated with responding to Requests for Proposal (RFPs), through a no-nonsense set-up, simple and intuitive user interface, and robust integrations with Salesforce and Slack. Reviewers say compared to Cone, Responsive, formerly RFPIO is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive - Easier to admin Categories in common with Cone: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Cone vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) **Compare Responsive, formerly RFPIO with other alternatives:** - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/responsive-formerly-rfpio-vs-taxdome) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/qwilr-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) ### 7. [GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/products/getaccept/reviews) By GetAccept Inc. **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,267 GetAccept is an all-in-one solution for e-signature, contract management, proposal creation, sales collateral management, document tracking and prospecting. Used by sales, HR, customer success and development teams; personal video messaging, live chat and analytics are popular features. Reviewers say compared to Cone, GetAccept is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Cone: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Cone vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-getaccept) **Compare GetAccept with other alternatives:** - [GetAccept vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-pandadoc) - [GetAccept vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-proposify) - [GetAccept vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-taxdome) - [GetAccept vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-jotform-sign) - [GetAccept vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-nintex-nintex) - [GetAccept vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [GetAccept vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-qwilr) - [GetAccept vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-getaccept) - [GetAccept vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-karbon-2025-03-03) ### 8. [Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/products/qwilr/reviews) By Qwilr **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 911 Save time and win more work by replacing your sales documents with interactive & mobile-friendly webpages that plug into your systems and are as easy to build and reuse as they are beautiful. Reviewers say compared to Cone, Qwilr is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive - Easier to admin Categories in common with Cone: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Cone vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-qwilr) **Compare Qwilr with other alternatives:** - [Qwilr vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/pandadoc-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/proposify-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/qwilr-vs-taxdome) - [Qwilr vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/nintex-nintex-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/qwilr-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Qwilr vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-qwilr) - [Qwilr vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-qwilr) ### 9. [Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/products/conga-composer/reviews) By Conga **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 913 Conga Composer makes it easy for Salesforce.com users to create sophisticated documents and reports using their data in Salesforce CRM with just a few clicks. Reviewers say compared to Cone, Conga Composer is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Cone: [Proposal](https://www.g2.com/categories/proposal) **Compare:** [Cone vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-conga-composer) **Compare Conga Composer with other alternatives:** - [Conga Composer vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-pandadoc) - [Conga Composer vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-proposify) - [Conga Composer vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-taxdome) - [Conga Composer vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-jotform-sign) - [Conga Composer vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-nintex-nintex) - [Conga Composer vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Conga Composer vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-getaccept) - [Conga Composer vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-qwilr) - [Conga Composer vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-karbon-2025-03-03) ### 10. [Karbon](https://www.g2.com/products/karbon-2025-03-03/reviews) By KarbonHQ **Average Rating:** 4.8/5 **Total Reviews:** 895 Karbon is an advanced workstream collaboration platform integrated with your email. Reviewers say compared to Cone, Karbon is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Cone: [Accounting Practice Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/accounting-practice-management) **Compare:** [Cone vs Karbon](https://www.g2.com/compare/cone-accounting-practice-management-vs-karbon-2025-03-03) **Compare Karbon with other alternatives:** - [Karbon vs PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-pandadoc) - [Karbon vs Proposify](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-proposify) - [Karbon vs TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-taxdome) - [Karbon vs Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/compare/jotform-sign-vs-karbon-2025-03-03) - [Karbon vs Nintex](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-nintex-nintex) - [Karbon vs Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-responsive-formerly-rfpio) - [Karbon vs GetAccept](https://www.g2.com/compare/getaccept-vs-karbon-2025-03-03) - [Karbon vs Qwilr](https://www.g2.com/compare/karbon-2025-03-03-vs-qwilr) - [Karbon vs Conga Composer](https://www.g2.com/compare/conga-composer-vs-karbon-2025-03-03) --- ## Cone Alternatives FAQs ### Which Proposal tools do reviewers recommend instead of Cone? Reviewers highly recommend [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) for its ease of use (718 mentions), comprehensive document management, built-in e-signatures, and seamless CRM integrations. [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) is favored for its professional templates, sales-focused features, and real-time tracking capabilities. [TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/products/taxdome/reviews) is praised for its all-in-one platform combining CRM, workflow automation, and client portal, ideal for tax and accounting firms. [Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/products/jotform-sign/reviews) is recommended for its simplicity, ease of setup, and strong integration with form workflows, making it efficient for quick and compliant e-signature processes. ### What are the best alternatives to Cone? The best alternatives to Cone include [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) (4.7/5 with 3501 reviews), [Proposify](https://www.g2.com/products/proposify/reviews) (4.6/5 with 1135 reviews), [TaxDome](https://www.g2.com/products/taxdome/reviews) (4.7/5 with 701 reviews), and [Jotform Sign](https://www.g2.com/products/jotform-sign/reviews) (4.7/5 with 1710 reviews). These alternatives offer robust proposal and document management features with strong user satisfaction and extensive review counts. ### How does Cone compare to PandaDoc? According to G2 data, [Cone](https://www.g2.com/products/cone-accounting-practice-management/reviews) holds a higher average rating of 4.9/5 across 34 reviews compared to [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews)'s 4.7/5 from 3,501 reviews. Cone leads in key dimensions such as Better at Meeting Requirements (9.7 vs 9.2, a 0.5-point lead), Better at Support (9.8 vs 9.1, a 0.7-point lead), and Easier to Do Business With (9.6 vs 9.3, a 0.3-point lead). PandaDoc scores slightly higher in Easier to Admin (9.1 vs 8.7, a 0.4-point lead) and matches Cone in Easier to Set Up (9.1 each). Both products are praised for ease of use, with Cone receiving 18 mentions and PandaDoc 718 mentions of ease of use in reviews. Cone is noted for its outstanding customer support (15 mentions) and cost-effectiveness, while PandaDoc is recognized for its comprehensive document management, e-signature capabilities, and extensive template features. Users highlight Cone's simplicity, time-saving automation, and strong integration with accounting workflows, whereas PandaDoc excels in CRM integrations (notably HubSpot and Salesforce), real-time document tracking, and a robust content library. Both platforms offer intuitive interfaces but differ in scale and feature depth, with PandaDoc serving larger user bases and more complex workflows, and Cone focusing on streamlined, cost-effective practice management solutions. ### Why do users choose PandaDoc over Cone? Users choose [PandaDoc](https://www.g2.com/products/pandadoc/reviews) over Cone primarily for its extensive document management and e-signature functionalities, which are highly valued in 353 and 304 reviews respectively. PandaDoc's seamless integrations with CRMs like HubSpot and Salesforce, along with its real-time tracking of document status and activity, provide significant workflow efficiencies for sales and contract management teams. The platform's template system and content library enable rapid document creation and customization, supporting complex sales cycles and collaboration needs. Additionally, PandaDoc's user-friendly interface and ease of setup (256 mentions) facilitate quick adoption across diverse teams. Despite some mentions of pricing concerns and occasional editing difficulties, PandaDoc's comprehensive feature set, scalability, and strong CRM integrations make it the preferred choice for organizations requiring advanced contract lifecycle management and sales enablement tools. Users also appreciate PandaDoc's ability to streamline approvals, automate workflows, and provide detailed analytics, which contribute to faster deal closures and improved operational visibility. ### What features do alternatives offer that Cone does not? Cone lacks some advanced integrations and certain customization options that alternatives provide, such as extensive CRM integrations and more flexible template customization. ## Explore Articles - [What is the most recommended software to boos employee engagaement in office?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-recommended-software-to-boost-employee-engagement-in-offices) - [Trusted identity verification service for app developers](https://www.g2.com/discussions/trusted-identity-verification-service-for-app-developers) - [What's the top accounts receivable app for business](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-top-accounts-receivable-app-for-business) - [Which video content creation platform offers the best editing features?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-video-content-creation-platform-offers-the-best-editing-features) - [Best desktop affiliate marketing software for tech companies](https://www.g2.com/discussions/best-desktop-affiliate-marketing-software-for-tech-companies) - [What platform integrates PDF editing with cloud storage systems?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-platform-integrates-pdf-editing-with-cloud-storage-systems) ## Spotlight Categories - [Professional Services Automation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/professional-services-automation) - [Time Tracking Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/time-tracking-software) - [AI Sales Assistant Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/ai-sales-assistant)