Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) Reviews & Product Details

Well, RDS is a must as per me if your project is in AWS and you are working on relational databases, Few things I personally liked about Amazon RDS are that most of the operations like patching, backups, scalings etc are automatic so a lot of less effort needed from the operations side, and I don't think any other RDS works as good as Amazon RDS works with AWS. I also found all the operations being performed very smoothly, and I personally never faced any failures while using this, so definitely quite robust too. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are a few downside too here, first the cost of using this I feel is too high, initially the cost might seem normal but as your application scales cost increases a lot. Also I felt there is very less control over the database server which didn't let me customize a few things I wanted to. Also If a few more monitoring tools can definitely help the user to troubleshoot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Amazon RDS because it handles backups, scaling, and high availability without any maintenance hassle, making it incredibly reliable for my apps. The automated backups provide a constant safety net, allowing me to focus on building my applications rather than worrying about losing data. I also enjoy the effortless scaling that keeps performance smooth during unexpected spikes. Additionally, the built-in reliability with Multi-AZ deployments and automatic failover protects against outages, giving me peace of mind. The initial setup was surprisingly easy for our team, and we had a production-ready database running within minutes, removing much of the complexity usually faced with manual deployments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Amazon RDS is excellent overall, a few areas could be improved. The cost escalates quickly as storage and instance sizes grow, and more transparent pricing would help. Fine-grained control over server configuration is also limited compared to self-managed databases. Additionally, maintenance windows and failover times can occasionally feel longer than expected. Better visibility and faster transitions would make the service even stronger. Limited fine-grained control compared to self-managed databases. Restricted parameter tuning. No access to the operating system. Limited support for custom plugins and extensions. Storage and I/O behavior not fully customizable. Maintenance processes are controlled by AWS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's a worry free tool. Your life would be easier with this, You would not need to take backup and it would scale automatically your databases. And it's very easy to integrate and use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you are technical and know little bit more regarding database and it's management. I would suggest don't go with it, just go with traditional database. As because it's gonna be very expensive while scaling your project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The automatic management of backups, patches, and updates greatly reduces the operational load.

Scalability is immediate: you can move from small workloads to enterprise databases without interruptions.

Perfect integration with the AWS ecosystem (CloudWatch, IAM, Elastic Beanstalk). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The initial learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with AWS.

Costs can quickly escalate if resource usage is not well monitored.

Some advanced features (e.g., fine-tuning performance) still require manual intervention. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that RDS makes database management simple by handling backups, updates, and scaling automatically. It saves a lot of time and effort compared to managing databases on our own.The best part is how it reduces the manual work for maintenance and lets us focus more on development instead of infrastructure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the cost can add up quickly, especially for larger workloads, so budgeting needs extra attention. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

High availability and reliability, security. Support for almost all relational databases like mysql, postgre,maria and all. Fully managed, allows me complete provisioning and recovery, alongwith backups & scalability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The charges are really very high. An instance if left open, and unused might cost a fortune. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best thing about AWS Databases is the ease of usage and implementation. It is very easy to create a new database in seconds. It has a lot of database options such as Postgres, MySQL, Aurora, etc.

I personally like Aurora the best, with its serverless capabilities standing out from all other cloud providers.

I have been using Amazon Databases every day. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI is slightly not up to the mark for the Databases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is perfect for production loads where uptime and stability are crucial. It makes the DB management super easy because you dont have to worry about backups or scaling manually. Also, it is very smooth to integrate with other AWS services. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The pricing can get a bit steep once you enable Multi AZ. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The kind of database related services that AWS provides are nothing short of a miracle and the same goes for RDS whether. The best thing that you dont need to worry about the existing infrastructure and initially you don't have to worry about high costs of hardware procurement, RDS provides you with the pay as you go feature which has made the process of scaling much easier and user friendly. What amazed me was its compatibility with different db instances which made the process of its integration with my existing setup almost completely seamless. Amazon Aurora and RDS combined are I guess the best db management services out there and you have to worry about the backup as well as you get to decide the time period for which you want to keep the backup and incase of data loss when to recover it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Firstly, a caution to new users, initially navigating through the RDS interface can be a litlle tricky but once you get used to it, hopefully it won't be a problem to most. The only thing that I think needs improvement is the customer support and I am not talking about the advanced plan, it has outrightly good support, I am talking about the basic plan because at starting sometimes I felt that the I had more technical assistance from amazon it could have saved me some time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Support for all the different db engine with their version

Easy to get configure,implement and get started Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing as such to dislike, but yes, the pricing for the RDS can be reduced

Also, if there can be the functionality to connect to the DB over the AWS console itsel,f it would be handy Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.