AI Interviewer Reviews & Product Details

The implementation process is extremely smooth, with setup taking less than two minutes. The platform offers a wide range of features, including video interviews, phone screening, resume screening, and coding assessments with a built-in IDE that supports over 20 programming languages. I use it weekly for initial candidate screening. The interface is intuitive—simply set up your interview criteria, generate a link, and send it to candidates. The AI dynamically adapts questions in real time, rephrasing them if candidates have difficulty and probing further based on their answers. Fraud detection features are thorough, identifying multiple faces, external monitors, screen sharing, AI-generated responses, and lip-sync cheating. At only $1 per interview, it is exceptionally cost-effective for high-volume screening. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The AI interview process can come across as impersonal, especially for candidates who value direct human interaction. Some strong candidates may find it challenging if they are not comfortable with video interviews or using technology. Integration options are currently limited, as the platform only supports Slack and WhatsApp, with no ATS integrations available yet. While customer support is responsive, the platform is still quite new (having launched in January 2025), so certain features feel underdeveloped. The evaluation criteria can be unclear at times, making it difficult to understand why a candidate received a low score. Although there is multilingual support, the accuracy of assessments varies depending on the language. The platform is most effective for technical roles, but it tends to have difficulty accurately evaluating nuanced soft skills. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about AI Interviewer is how realistic and adaptive the interviews feel. The system doesn’t just ask preset questions — it analyzes answers in real time, adjusts its tone and follow-ups, and creates a natural conversation flow. It’s especially impressive in how it assesses soft skills and communication ability, not just keywords. The dashboard makes it easy to review candidate responses, generate summaries, and share feedback with the hiring team. Implementation was smooth, and the integration with ATS platforms like Greenhouse and Workday made adoption painless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At times, the AI can overanalyze phrasing or give slightly inconsistent scoring on borderline answers. While the feedback summaries are detailed, it would be helpful to have more customizable evaluation templates for different roles or departments. The user interface is clean but could benefit from a dark mode and faster video rendering when reviewing longer interviews. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The dashboard was simple and user-friendly. The AI interview process felt natural, and the coding environment worked smoothly without any issues. The AI-generated reports gave clear, data-backed insights on how I did, which was really helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The interview process was smooth from start to finish. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really liked the interview process with Hyring's AI interviewer. Both the AI phone screening and coding interview was simple and clear. The detailed reports after each round helped me to find my strengths and areas of improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as of now. The overall interview process was good with AI interviewer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The automated video interviews with built-in cheat detection and detailed scoring help us shortlist candidates quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing much at the moment. It works well for our needs, though adding features like an ATS in the future would make it even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The AI interviewer has significantly reduced our time-to-hire by automating the initial screening process. It conducts consistent, unbiased interviews and evaluates candidates with structured scoring, allowing our hiring managers to focus only on the most qualified applicants. The natural language processing is impressive—candidates feel like they're speaking with a real person. Integration with our ATS was also seamless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There was a bit of a learning curve during setup, particularly with customizing the interview scripts to align with our company’s tone and culture. Additionally, while the AI is great for first-round interviews, we still prefer human interaction for later stages. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What surprised us most about Hyring’s AI Interviewer was the interview intelligence. It didn’t just ask questions and record answers. It actually listened, understood, and analyzed every response. The AI highlighted not just what was said, but how it was said like tone, clarity, and confidence. We got instant summaries, smart scores, and even tags like “Strong communicator” or “Needs follow-up.” It also flagged possible AI-written answers, which helped us avoid wasting time. It felt like having a sharp interviewer who never gets tired and treats every candidate fairly. This made our screening faster, deeper, and way more effective. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as of now. Hyring is constantly upgrading as per our feedback. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best is the AI Interviewer’s ability to deliver consistent, unbiased evaluations at scale. It streamlines the screening process, reduces human error, and allows our team to focus on high-potential candidates more efficiently. Its ability to save time without compromising candidate quality is outstanding. We were able to automate the initial screening process, which sped up hiring and reduced overhead significantly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Transparency and Trust Issues: Candidates often don't know how they're being evaluated by an AI or what criteria are prioritized, which creates a feeling of unfairness or opacity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user interface was minimalistic and easy to navigate. The AI generated reports are insightful covering various aspects like code quality, technical score, fit score and more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing at the moment. It works good for my needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One new thing I really appreciate about the AI Interviewer is how intelligent and adaptable the evaluation process has become. The keyword-based scoring system lets us tailor assessments to exactly what we're looking for in candidates, and it’s surprisingly accurate in highlighting the most relevant responses. I also noticed that the AI is better at picking up soft skills and context in answers now, not just keywords. Plus, the ability to customize questions and review detailed performance analytics for each applicant has made shortlisting faster and much more objective. It’s like having a smart assistant who understands both our hiring criteria and the nuances of candidate communication. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall, the AI Interviewer works really well Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.