AI Interviewer Pricing Overview

Crazy fast response and a great pricing model to support companies of all sizes.

You will be amazed how fast you can set up and get moving. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

They release quite a bit of features frequently and sometimes it is a bit hard to catch up. Would prefer detailed tutorials and roll outs so that we get the most out of our subscription. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The implementation process is extremely smooth, with setup taking less than two minutes. The platform offers a wide range of features, including video interviews, phone screening, resume screening, and coding assessments with a built-in IDE that supports over 20 programming languages. I use it weekly for initial candidate screening. The interface is intuitive—simply set up your interview criteria, generate a link, and send it to candidates. The AI dynamically adapts questions in real time, rephrasing them if candidates have difficulty and probing further based on their answers. Fraud detection features are thorough, identifying multiple faces, external monitors, screen sharing, AI-generated responses, and lip-sync cheating. At only $1 per interview, it is exceptionally cost-effective for high-volume screening. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The AI interview process can come across as impersonal, especially for candidates who value direct human interaction. Some strong candidates may find it challenging if they are not comfortable with video interviews or using technology. Integration options are currently limited, as the platform only supports Slack and WhatsApp, with no ATS integrations available yet. While customer support is responsive, the platform is still quite new (having launched in January 2025), so certain features feel underdeveloped. The evaluation criteria can be unclear at times, making it difficult to understand why a candidate received a low score. Although there is multilingual support, the accuracy of assessments varies depending on the language. The platform is most effective for technical roles, but it tends to have difficulty accurately evaluating nuanced soft skills. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.