Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare SOLIDWORKS and SolidWorks Flow Simulation 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
SOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(620)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSSolidWorks Flow Simulation
Star Rating
(35)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SolidWorks Flow SimulationSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 9.7, making it a preferred choice for detailed design work, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation, with a score of 8.1 in fluid analysis, is noted for its specialized capabilities in simulating fluid dynamics.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS offers superior drawing tools, scoring 9.7, which enhances the drafting process significantly compared to SolidWorks Flow Simulation's lower score of 8.3 in drawing tools, indicating a more robust feature set for technical documentation.
- G2 users highlight that SOLIDWORKS has a better overall ease of use rating of 8.6, which is beneficial for new users, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation, with a score of 8.3, is perceived as slightly more complex due to its advanced simulation features.
- Users on G2 report that SOLIDWORKS provides a more comprehensive library management system, scoring 8.9 for categorization and search capabilities, whereas SolidWorks Flow Simulation's library features are less emphasized, impacting user experience in managing components.
- Reviewers say that SOLIDWORKS shines in its integration capabilities with CAD & PLM systems, achieving a score of 9.5, which is crucial for users looking for seamless workflows, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation, with a score of 8.5, offers decent integration but lacks the depth found in SOLIDWORKS.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS has a higher product direction score of 8.5, indicating a positive outlook for future updates and features, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation's score of 7.1 suggests some concerns among users regarding its ongoing development and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableSolidWorks Flow Simulation
No pricing availableFree Trial
SOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableSolidWorks Flow Simulation
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
516
8.6
30
Ease of Use
8.6
520
8.3
30
Ease of Setup
8.2
92
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.9
46
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
457
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
46
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
511
7.1
28
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
9.1
41
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.9
41
Not enough data
CNC Programming
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
Machining
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
Design
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.3
95
Not enough data
8.1
95
Not enough data
Edit
8.5
94
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
9.3
94
Not enough data
8.3
82
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.6
91
Not enough data
9.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
87
Not enough data
Library
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
CAD
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
Integration
8.5
25
Not enough data
9.6
27
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
Data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.1
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
Logistics
9.1
25
Not enough data
Design
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Work
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.4
51
Not enough data
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
58
Not enough data
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
57
Not enough data
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
7.7
47
Not enough data
8.6
52
Not enough data
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
6.1
19
Not enough data
6.1
19
Not enough data
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
8.8
43
Not enough data
9.1
42
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
9.3
43
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.2
40
Not enough data
Tools
9.4
42
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
9.2
42
Not enough data
Design
9.4
42
Not enough data
Design
7.7
11
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
Tools
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
Library
8.1
12
Not enough data
Platform
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
Customization
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
Design
9.2
59
8.8
8
9.0
59
8.3
8
8.8
59
7.7
8
7.6
58
7.7
8
Tools
7.9
52
8.1
8
7.9
54
7.7
8
7.3
47
8.1
8
Work
7.5
40
8.3
8
7.8
41
8.5
8
8.2
48
8.3
8
8.1
43
7.7
8
8.4
46
8.5
8
Environment
8.3
52
8.1
8
8.4
50
8.3
8
8.2
48
9.0
8
8.6
52
8.8
8
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
8.2
22
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SOLIDWORKS and SolidWorks Flow Simulation are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), General-Purpose CAD, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
SolidWorks Flow Simulation is categorized as MEP
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.7%
Design
12.1%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.0%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.9%
Information Technology and Services
21.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
12.1%
Design
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Automotive
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
YP
SOLIDWORKS IS USED FOR MULTIPLE WORK LIKE 2D & 3D CAD MODELING, ASSEMBLY MODELING, SHWWET METAL MODELING, SURFACE MODELING, RENDERING, SIMULATION, 3D...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
SolidWorks Flow Simulation has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
