Compare SOLIDWORKS and SolidWorks Flow Simulation 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
SOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(633)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSSolidWorks Flow Simulation
Star Rating
(35)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SolidWorks Flow SimulationSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SOLIDWORKS excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to SolidWorks Flow Simulation. Users appreciate its comprehensive features for 3D modeling and simulation, with one reviewer highlighting its ability to design and simulate complex systems with ease.
- Users say that SOLIDWORKS offers a more intuitive interface, making it easier for both beginners and experienced users to navigate. Reviewers have noted that the software simplifies the process of changing dimensions and converting files from other CAD applications, which enhances productivity.
- According to verified reviews, SolidWorks Flow Simulation is recognized for its simplicity and ease of use, particularly for users on a budget. One user mentioned that it requires minimal input to generate outputs, making it a good choice for less critical projects where high accuracy is not paramount.
- Reviewers mention that while SOLIDWORKS has a robust set of features, including advanced tools for parametric modeling and simulations, SolidWorks Flow Simulation is perceived as more limited in its capabilities. Users looking for extensive simulation options may find SOLIDWORKS to be the better fit.
- G2 reviewers highlight that SOLIDWORKS has a strong support system, with a quality of support score that reflects its commitment to helping users. In contrast, SolidWorks Flow Simulation has received mixed feedback regarding support, indicating that users may face challenges when seeking assistance.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS is particularly effective for small businesses, as evidenced by its large market segment presence. Reviewers appreciate the extensive tools available for various design needs, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation, although popular among small businesses, may not offer the same breadth of features for more complex projects.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableSolidWorks Flow Simulation
No pricing availableFree Trial
SOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableSolidWorks Flow Simulation
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
526
8.6
30
Ease of Use
8.6
530
8.3
30
Ease of Setup
8.2
102
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.0
47
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
466
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
47
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
521
7.1
28
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
9.0
42
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
CNC Programming
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.4
37
Not enough data
Machining
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
Design
9.4
104
Not enough data
9.4
104
Not enough data
9.2
100
Not enough data
8.1
100
Not enough data
Edit
8.5
97
Not enough data
8.4
90
Not enough data
9.3
99
Not enough data
8.3
85
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.6
94
Not enough data
9.0
96
Not enough data
8.4
90
Not enough data
Library
8.9
28
Not enough data
8.6
28
Not enough data
8.4
28
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
CAD
8.8
24
Not enough data
9.4
30
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
Integration
8.5
26
Not enough data
9.6
29
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
Data
9.2
28
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.3
26
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
Logistics
9.1
25
Not enough data
Design
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Work
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
8.7
61
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
8.4
52
Not enough data
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
7.5
55
Not enough data
8.6
60
Not enough data
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
49
Not enough data
8.8
58
Not enough data
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
7.7
48
Not enough data
8.6
53
Not enough data
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
6.0
20
Not enough data
6.1
20
Not enough data
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
8.9
44
Not enough data
9.1
43
Not enough data
9.1
43
Not enough data
9.3
44
Not enough data
8.3
35
Not enough data
8.3
41
Not enough data
Tools
9.5
43
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
9.2
43
Not enough data
Design
9.4
43
Not enough data
Design
7.9
12
Not enough data
7.8
12
Not enough data
Tools
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
Library
8.2
13
Not enough data
Platform
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.1
12
Not enough data
Customization
7.8
12
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
Design
9.2
60
8.8
8
9.0
61
8.3
8
8.8
61
7.7
8
7.6
59
7.7
8
Tools
8.0
54
8.1
8
7.9
56
7.7
8
7.4
49
8.1
8
Work
7.6
41
8.3
8
7.8
42
8.5
8
8.3
50
8.3
8
8.1
44
7.7
8
8.4
47
8.5
8
Environment
8.3
53
8.1
8
8.4
51
8.3
8
8.2
49
9.0
8
8.6
53
8.8
8
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
9.3
28
Not enough data
8.6
26
Not enough data
9.3
27
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
7.7
25
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.7
30
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
8.2
27
Not enough data
8.1
25
Not enough data
7.5
30
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.1
25
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
7.9
23
Not enough data
8.9
25
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SOLIDWORKS and SolidWorks Flow Simulation are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), General-Purpose CAD, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
SolidWorks Flow Simulation is categorized as MEP
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
23.1%
Design
11.9%
Automotive
6.7%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.9%
Medical Devices
5.9%
Other
46.6%
Information Technology and Services
21.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
12.1%
Design
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Automotive
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
TS
A person can use SolidWorks for many things, Part modeling, Assembly Testing, rendering, Creating working animation of any machine or product. Start...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
SolidWorks Flow Simulation has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
or continue with
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
