Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Pirani and World-Check On Demand 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Noggin
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
VelocityEHS Accelerate | EHS & ESG
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hawk
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (62.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (36.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Per Month
No pricing available
Pirani
Star Rating
(286)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (62.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansWorld-Check On Demand
Star Rating
(55)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (36.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about World-Check On DemandSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Refinitiv World-Check Risk Intelligence excels in Watch List functionality with a score of 9.5, while Pirani follows closely with a score of 9.3, indicating that both products effectively manage compliance risks but Refinitiv has a slight edge in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Pirani offers superior Fraud Detection capabilities, scoring 9.8 compared to Refinitiv's 9.0, suggesting that users find Pirani more effective in identifying potential fraudulent activities.
- G2 users highlight that Pirani has a more user-friendly experience, with both products scoring 8.8 in Ease of Use, but Pirani's overall higher G2 rating of 4.6 suggests a more favorable reception among users.
- Users on G2 report that Pirani provides better Quality of Support, scoring 9.6 compared to Refinitiv's 8.9, indicating that users feel more supported when using Pirani.
- Reviewers say that Pirani shines in Due Diligence with a score of 9.7, while Refinitiv scores 9.0, suggesting that Pirani offers more comprehensive tools for compliance checks and risk assessments.
- Users report that Refinitiv World-Check Risk Intelligence has a more robust Audit Trail feature, which is crucial for tracking compliance activities, although specific scores were not provided, indicating a strong focus on audit management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Pirani
Free
Free
Per Month
Create Processes, Risks and controls.
Create your 5x5 risk heatmap.
Risk heat map report
5 users, 200 inputs.
- Create Processes, Risks and controls.
- Create your 5x5 risk heatmap.
- Risk heat map report
World-Check On Demand
No pricing availableFree Trial
Pirani
Free Trial is available
World-Check On Demand
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
70
8.7
37
Ease of Use
9.0
217
8.8
38
Ease of Setup
8.6
135
8.5
16
Ease of Admin
9.4
36
9.3
14
Quality of Support
9.5
68
8.9
36
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
34
8.7
14
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
67
7.3
35
Features by Category
Platform Data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Interoperability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Basics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Financial Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audit Management
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Regulatory Change Management
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
Risk Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Third Party & Supplier Risk Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
Business Continuity Management
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
Ethics and Compliance Learning
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
Platform
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
Services
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
Fraud Detection
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
Compliance
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.9
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
Reporting
8.8
14
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
Generative AI - Anti Money Laundering
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Anti Money Laundering
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring - IT Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Onboarding - Contractor Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Document Management - Contractor Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management - Contractor Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operational Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Business Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Operational Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Security Compliance
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Pirani and World-Check On Demand share no categories
Unique Categories
Pirani is categorized as Operational Risk Management, IT Risk Management, Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), Security Compliance, and Contractor Risk Management
World-Check On Demand is categorized as Financial Risk Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Pirani
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
World-Check On Demand
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
34.0%
Banking
18.3%
Insurance
6.7%
Information Technology and Services
5.6%
Accounting
3.0%
Other
32.5%
Banking
32.0%
Financial Services
22.0%
Legal Services
6.0%
Law Practice
6.0%
Accounting
6.0%
Other
28.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Pirani has no discussions with answers
What is Refinitiv World-Check?
1 Comment
MA
It’s a smart application for background screening of individual and entities for global sanctions and adverse media at the time of onboarding and during the...Read more
World-Check On Demand has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
