Compare OpenSim and SOLIDWORKS 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (44.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenSim
Star Rating
(22)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenSimSOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(643)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SOLIDWORKS excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to OpenSim. Users appreciate its intuitive interface, which makes 3D modeling and assembly straightforward, even for complex designs.
- According to verified reviews, SOLIDWORKS has a robust feature set that includes advanced tools for parametric modeling, simulations, and drawings. Users highlight the ease of converting files from other CAD software, which enhances productivity and streamlines workflows.
- Users say that OpenSim is particularly user-friendly, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced users. The ability to easily customize models and run multiple gait cycles simultaneously is praised, showcasing its flexibility for specific experiments.
- Reviewers mention that while SOLIDWORKS offers a wealth of features, some users find the learning curve steep initially. However, once familiar, they appreciate the extensive capabilities, such as the sheet metal features that simplify the creation of complex designs.
- G2 reviewers highlight the quality of support for SOLIDWORKS, which is rated higher than that of OpenSim. Users report positive experiences with customer service, noting that assistance is readily available when needed, enhancing their overall experience with the software.
- According to recent feedback, OpenSim's open-source nature allows for easy editing and combining of musculoskeletal models, which is a significant advantage for users focused on biomechanics. However, its lower overall satisfaction score indicates that it may not meet the needs of all users as effectively as SOLIDWORKS does.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenSim
No pricing availableSOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenSim
No trial information availableSOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
16
8.8
534
Ease of Use
7.3
16
8.6
539
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.2
111
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.0
47
Quality of Support
6.5
16
8.2
474
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
47
Product Direction (% positive)
7.8
16
8.6
528
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
Not enough data
9.0
42
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
8.9
43
CNC Programming
Not enough data
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.4
37
Machining
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.8
39
Design
Not enough data
9.5
107
Not enough data
9.4
107
Not enough data
9.2
103
Not enough data
8.1
100
Edit
Not enough data
8.5
98
Not enough data
8.4
90
Not enough data
9.3
101
Not enough data
8.3
85
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.6
94
Not enough data
9.0
96
Not enough data
8.4
90
Library
Not enough data
8.9
29
Not enough data
8.6
28
Not enough data
8.4
28
Not enough data
8.6
23
CAD
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
9.4
30
Not enough data
9.1
29
Integration
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
9.6
29
Not enough data
8.6
25
Data
Not enough data
9.3
29
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.3
26
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.7
25
Logistics
Not enough data
9.1
25
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
8.7
61
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
8.4
52
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.5
55
Not enough data
8.6
60
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
49
Not enough data
8.8
58
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.7
48
Not enough data
8.6
53
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
6.0
20
Not enough data
6.1
20
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
Not enough data
8.9
44
Not enough data
9.1
43
Not enough data
9.1
43
Not enough data
9.3
44
Not enough data
8.3
35
Not enough data
8.3
41
Tools
Not enough data
9.5
43
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
9.2
43
Design
Not enough data
9.4
43
Design
Not enough data
7.9
12
Not enough data
7.8
12
Tools
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.7
13
Library
Not enough data
8.2
13
Platform
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.1
12
Customization
Not enough data
7.8
12
Not enough data
8.3
12
Design
7.4
9
9.2
62
6.3
5
9.0
62
7.1
8
8.8
62
7.7
8
7.7
60
Tools
7.0
5
8.0
54
7.0
5
7.9
56
7.7
13
7.4
49
Work
8.1
8
7.6
41
7.7
11
7.8
42
7.8
10
8.3
51
5.3
5
8.1
44
7.3
5
8.4
47
Environment
7.5
6
8.3
53
8.1
9
8.4
51
9.0
5
8.2
49
7.6
12
8.6
53
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
9.4
35
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
7.7
25
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.6
31
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
8.3
29
Not enough data
8.0
26
Not enough data
7.3
32
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.0
27
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
7.9
23
Not enough data
9.0
27
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenSim and SOLIDWORKS are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
OpenSim is categorized as Other Health Care
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), General-Purpose CAD, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenSim
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
40.0%
Research
15.0%
Biotechnology
15.0%
Medical Devices
10.0%
Higher Education
10.0%
Other
10.0%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
23.1%
Design
11.7%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.9%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
kjkjhkjhj
1 Comment
TA
????????Read more
Can I use it for developing a new software?
1 Comment
TA
You can develop custom simulation frameworks, toolboxes, and plug-ins using the tools available.
It is also possible to develop a stand-alone separate...Read more
What is the easiest was to scale a model?
1 Comment
TA
The easiest way to scale a model is by using the scaling tool (using the height and weight of the subject).
However, for more accurate models individuals...Read more
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
TS
A person can use SolidWorks for many things, Part modeling, Assembly Testing, rendering, Creating working animation of any machine or product. Start...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
