Users report that Mudbox excels in sculpting with a score of 9.6, making it a preferred choice for detailed character modeling, while ZBrush, although strong, has a slightly lower sculpting score of 9.0.
Reviewers mention that ZBrush offers a superior brush variety with a score of 9.6 compared to Mudbox's 9.2, allowing for more creative freedom and versatility in design.
G2 users highlight that Mudbox is easier to use, scoring 8.7 in ease of use, which is beneficial for beginners, whereas ZBrush's score of 6.6 indicates a steeper learning curve.
Users on G2 report that ZBrush has a better overall product direction with a positive score of 9.0, suggesting that it is more likely to evolve and meet future user needs compared to Mudbox's score of 6.5.
Reviewers say that Mudbox's texture capabilities are rated at 9.0, which is impressive, but ZBrush's dynamic tessellation feature, scoring 9.4, allows for more complex and detailed models, making it a favorite among advanced users.
Users report that ZBrush's integration capabilities score 9.0, making it easier to incorporate into existing workflows, while Mudbox's integration score of 8.4 is still solid but not as robust.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mudbox
2 Year
$160
for 2 years
Ideal for businesses that want consistent long-term pricing.
Is there a way to have a 3D sculpt that has been converted to an image file?
1 Comment
AM
Hey Shariece,
Thanks for the question.
I'm having a little bit of trouble figuring out what your question is asking, I'm going to assume this is the...Read more
In The near futuro, Will you upgrade the rendering options and camera controls?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.