Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Jitterbit and Kong Gateway 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MindCloud
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1 EDI Source, an Epicor solution
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.6% of reviews)
Mid-Market (40.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Pay As You Go Per Month
Jitterbit
Star Rating
(582)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansKong Gateway
Star Rating
(276)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Pay As You Go Per Month
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Kong GatewaySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Jitterbit excels in Quality of Support, scoring 9.0 compared to Kong Gateway's 8.3. Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, often providing quick resolutions to issues.
- Reviewers mention that Kong Gateway shines in Scalability, with a score of 9.1 versus Jitterbit's 8.1. Users on G2 highlight Kong's ability to handle increased traffic seamlessly, making it a preferred choice for growing businesses.
- Users say that both products have similar Ease of Use scores of 8.6, but Jitterbit's Ease of Admin is rated higher at 8.7 compared to Kong's 8.3. Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's intuitive interface simplifies administrative tasks, enhancing user experience.
- G2 users report that Jitterbit's Data Transformation capabilities are superior, scoring 8.7 against Kong's 7.9. Reviewers highlight Jitterbit's robust transformation tools, which allow for complex data manipulations with ease.
- Users on G2 mention that Kong Gateway has a slight edge in Traffic Control, scoring 8.8 compared to Jitterbit's 8.1. Reviewers appreciate Kong's advanced traffic management features, which help optimize API performance during peak loads.
- Reviewers mention that while Jitterbit has a strong Product Direction score of 8.7, Kong Gateway leads with 9.3. Users report that Kong's commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates is a significant factor in their satisfaction.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jitterbit
Standard
Contact Us
An entry-level solution for businesses looking to synchronize applications.
Kong Gateway
Kong Konnect
Pay As You Go
Per Month
- The easiest way to get started with Kong Gateway
- Customizable Dev Portal
- Plugins to extend capabilities including authentication, authorization, rate-limiting, transformations, security, and more
Free Trial
Jitterbit
Free Trial is available
Kong Gateway
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
460
8.5
233
Ease of Use
8.6
458
8.6
236
Ease of Setup
8.4
337
8.4
179
Ease of Admin
8.7
333
8.4
137
Quality of Support
9.0
435
8.3
220
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
332
8.7
126
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
433
9.3
224
Features by Category
Administration
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
27
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
Development
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
8.4
81
Not enough data
8.5
76
Not enough data
8.2
78
Not enough data
8.8
78
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.3
77
Not enough data
8.3
76
Not enough data
8.4
77
Functionality
8.8
65
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
64
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.3
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
Integrations
8.7
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
42
Not enough data
Security
8.4
54
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
52
|
Verified
Not enough data
Support
8.5
49
|
Verified
Not enough data
Development
8.8
147
Not enough data
8.4
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.4
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
38
Not enough data
8.0
32
Not enough data
Management
7.7
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
Security
8.4
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Integration Options
8.4
33
Not enough data
8.4
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
26
|
Verified
Not enough data
Deployment
8.4
31
Not enough data
8.5
30
Not enough data
Functionality
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.0
23
Not enough data
7.9
25
Not enough data
Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)Hide 15 FeaturesShow 15 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Prompt Engineering - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Inference Optimization - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Model Garden - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Custom Training - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Development - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Model Deployment - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Guardrails - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Model Monitoring - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Gateways & Routers - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development - API Platforms
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
7.2
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Collaboration - API Platforms
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
API Management - API Platforms
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
10
Application Design
8.0
70
Not enough data
7.8
65
Not enough data
8.5
79
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
Data Control
9.0
75
Not enough data
8.8
78
Not enough data
8.9
70
Not enough data
Publishing
8.8
75
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.8
75
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Interface Design
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
Data Control
8.9
50
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
Publishing
9.0
54
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
8.9
51
Not enough data
Agentic AI - No-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
8.5
62
8.4
174
8.2
57
8.7
177
8.4
57
8.2
177
8.1
59
9.1
173
API Management
8.1
55
8.8
179
7.9
59
8.3
180
8.2
58
8.3
175
Feature Not Available
7.3
162
7.9
50
8.9
178
Data Integration
8.3
57
8.6
171
8.7
57
7.9
160
7.9
51
8.7
170
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jitterbit and Kong Gateway are categorized as API Management
Unique Categories
Jitterbit is categorized as iPaaS, Low-Code Development Platforms, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), No-Code Development Platforms, Application Development Platforms, and Workplace Innovation Platforms
Kong Gateway is categorized as Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps), API Development, and API Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jitterbit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Kong Gateway
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
12.2%
Financial Services
6.4%
Computer Software
6.2%
Retail
4.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Other
65.9%
Computer Software
23.1%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Financial Services
8.8%
Banking
6.2%
Computer & Network Security
4.8%
Other
44.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What was the key moment that you realised the value of Vinyl?
1 Comment
RL
we were able to create quick websites within couple daysRead more
What is ZUDY vinyl?
1 Comment
MR
Zudy is the name of the company and Vinyl is the Software as a Service (SaaS) product they sell. It's kind of like saying Microsoft Word. Microsoft is a...Read more
Jitterbit has no more discussions with answers
What does KONG software do?
3 Comments
TP
Great question! Kong API Gateway is a service connectivity platform that allows teams to build, test, deploy, and securely expose their services across any...Read more
What is Kong API management?
1 Comment
Official Response from Kong Gateway
Kong Gateway is the fastest, most-adopted API gateway. It is cloud-native, lightweight, and vendor agnostic, so you can connect services across any cloud,...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
