Compare Jama Connect and OpenText Application Quality Management
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Jama Connect
Star Rating
(193)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Jama Connect
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality Management
Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Jama Connect excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to OpenText Application Quality Management. Users appreciate the intuitive interface and ease of use, which helps new users get up to speed quickly.
- According to verified reviews, OpenText Application Quality Management provides a comprehensive solution for managing the software development life cycle, with features for requirements gathering, defect logging, and tracking processes effectively. However, it struggles to match the user experience and flexibility offered by Jama Connect.
- Users say that Jama Connect's live traceability feature and review center for requirements are standout functionalities that enhance collaboration and clarity in requirements management. This level of detail is often highlighted as a key advantage over OpenText's offerings.
- Reviewers mention that while OpenText Application Quality Management is convenient and covers all aspects of the development process, it may not be as user-friendly as Jama Connect, which is praised for its powerful modification capabilities and linking of items.
- G2 reviewers highlight the quality of support provided by Jama Connect, noting its responsiveness and helpfulness, which contributes to a better overall user experience compared to OpenText, where users have expressed some concerns about support quality.
- According to recent user feedback, Jama Connect's robust user interface and ease of setup make it a preferred choice for many, while OpenText Application Quality Management, despite its comprehensive features, may require more effort to configure and adapt to specific workflows.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jama Connect
No pricing availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Jama Connect
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
170
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.3
173
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
7.8
120
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
8.1
104
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.6
160
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
103
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
165
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
112
Not enough data
9.0
114
Not enough data
9.0
117
Not enough data
Communication
8.4
107
Not enough data
8.4
106
Not enough data
Procedural
7.1
90
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jama Connect and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Requirements Management
Unique Categories
Jama Connect has no unique categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jama Connect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Medical Devices
24.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.9%
Automotive
7.4%
Computer Software
6.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.3%
Other
48.4%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What other tools are out there that, in your opinion can compete with Jama Connect?
2 Comments
SR
IBM DOORS Next ! Web based RM tool with Reviews, Reporting , Change and Configuration Management and PLE Read more
Are there demand on synchronization of Test Steps data field from test cases between two Jama instances through Tasktop Integration Hub tool?
2 Comments
DW
Hi Lien! It looks like Tasktop introduced Test Synchronization earlier this year. Here is a link offering additional information -...Read more
How does Jama Connect support large-scale projects?
1 Comment
Official Response from Jama Connect
Jama Connect's scalability benchmarks include:
- Support for up to 10 million items per project and 100 million items per instance.
- Capability to...Read more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
