Users report that IFS assyst has a more user-friendly interface, with a score of 6.7 for Ease of Use, while Oracle IT Service Management Suite scores higher at 7.9, indicating that users find it easier to navigate and utilize.
Reviewers mention that Oracle's ticketing system is more robust, with features like automated ticket routing scoring 8.1, compared to IFS assyst's lower performance in similar functionalities, which can lead to more efficient incident management.
G2 users highlight that Oracle IT Service Management Suite excels in reporting capabilities, with a dashboard score of 6.7, while IFS assyst's reporting features are perceived as less comprehensive, impacting decision-making processes.
Users on G2 indicate that IFS assyst's asset management features, particularly in hardware and software asset inventory, are less extensive than those offered by Oracle, which provides a more thorough asset discovery process.
Reviewers say that Oracle's compliance features, including ITIL policy compliance and risk management, are more advanced, scoring higher in areas like access management and policy enforcement, which are critical for enterprise-level operations.
Users report that IFS assyst's support quality, with a score of 6.8, falls short compared to Oracle's 7.9, suggesting that users may experience better assistance and resolution times with Oracle's service management suite.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IFS assyst
No pricing available
Oracle IT Service Management Suite
No pricing available
Free Trial
IFS assyst
No trial information available
Oracle IT Service Management Suite
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.4
12
8.3
31
Ease of Use
6.7
12
7.9
31
Ease of Setup
7.5
8
8.0
11
Ease of Admin
7.3
8
8.2
11
Quality of Support
6.8
10
7.9
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.