Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Aleph and Datarails 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aleph
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cube
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (81.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (72.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Aleph
Star Rating
(63)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (81.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about AlephDatarails
Star Rating
(247)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about DatarailsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Datarails offers a solid integration experience with existing financial systems, scoring 8.7 in Integration, while Aleph excels with a score of 9.1, highlighting its seamless connectivity with various platforms, making it easier for teams to collaborate and share data.
- Reviewers mention that Datarails provides robust data validation features, scoring 8.5, but Aleph outshines with a score of 9.1, indicating that users appreciate Aleph's more comprehensive validation processes that help ensure data accuracy and reliability.
- G2 users highlight Datarails' strong performance in version control, scoring 9.1, which allows teams to track changes effectively. In contrast, Aleph, with a score of 8.7, offers version control but lacks some of the advanced features that Datarails provides, according to user feedback.
- Users on G2 report that Datarails has a user-friendly dashboard experience, scoring 8.3, while Aleph's dashboard, with a score of 8.2, is noted for its simplicity but lacks some of the customization options that Datarails offers, making it less flexible for specific user needs.
- Reviewers mention that Datarails excels in providing proactive assistance with a score of 7.3, which users find helpful for navigating the software. Aleph, however, scores lower at 6.7, indicating that users feel it could improve in offering timely support and guidance.
- Users say that Datarails has a strong focus on budgeting features, scoring 8.3, which many find beneficial for financial planning. Aleph, with a score of 8.6, is praised for its enhanced budgeting capabilities, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize detailed financial forecasting.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aleph
No pricing availableDatarails
No pricing availableFree Trial
Aleph
Free Trial is available
Datarails
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
62
8.8
219
Ease of Use
9.3
63
8.0
226
Ease of Setup
9.4
60
7.6
187
Ease of Admin
9.7
29
8.3
142
Quality of Support
9.7
62
9.3
216
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.9
30
9.2
142
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
60
9.4
224
Features by Category
Budget Creation
9.7
46
9.0
148
9.2
46
8.4
134
9.3
47
8.8
133
8.7
47
8.5
143
8.3
45
7.8
111
8.9
45
8.6
137
Budget Management
9.0
46
8.7
139
8.8
46
8.3
126
Feature Not Available
7.9
120
Forecasting
9.2
47
8.8
135
9.1
46
8.2
126
9.1
45
8.3
124
9.0
44
8.2
123
Feature Not Available
6.7
87
Analytics
9.2
46
8.4
135
9.1
45
8.4
127
8.9
44
8.2
117
Agentic AI - Budgeting and Forecasting
6.3
8
7.1
32
6.0
8
7.0
32
6.7
8
7.3
33
Data Management
9.5
48
9.0
159
9.4
48
9.0
158
9.1
46
8.5
155
Reporting Structure
9.0
48
8.5
138
8.2
45
8.1
144
8.4
45
8.3
146
Standard Analytics
8.4
46
8.3
134
8.3
44
8.2
143
9.1
48
8.6
148
9.7
48
8.9
153
Custom Analytics
8.3
45
8.4
149
8.3
45
8.4
133
8.6
43
8.8
147
8.8
46
8.2
147
9.0
46
8.5
99
Agentic AI - Financial Analysis
7.4
7
7.1
26
7.4
7
7.0
26
Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cash Flow Forecasting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Financial Data Transfer
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reconciliation
9.3
40
8.8
75
|
Verified
9.3
40
8.7
74
|
Verified
7.9
39
8.8
34
Reporting
9.1
38
8.4
77
|
Verified
8.6
38
8.1
78
|
Verified
8.6
37
8.4
76
|
Verified
Closing Process
Feature Not Available
7.6
61
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
7.0
60
|
Verified
9.1
39
7.8
62
|
Verified
AI - Financial Close
6.1
6
6.1
11
6.4
6
6.4
11
7.5
6
6.2
11
7.8
6
6.3
10
7.6
7
5.9
11
Financial Planning
8.4
24
8.0
78
|
Verified
9.1
24
8.8
86
|
Verified
9.0
24
8.7
85
|
Verified
Agentic AI - FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
6.4
11
6.7
27
7.3
11
7.0
27
Financial Insight
8.5
27
8.2
91
|
Verified
8.3
27
8.0
92
|
Verified
8.5
28
8.0
91
|
Verified
Data
7.7
26
8.7
95
|
Verified
8.8
27
8.7
97
|
Verified
9.2
28
9.1
96
|
Verified
8.1
26
8.2
93
|
Verified
Status Communication
7.6
27
8.3
91
|
Verified
8.8
27
9.1
92
|
Verified
8.9
26
9.0
96
|
Verified
7.7
25
8.0
29
Reconciliation - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audit - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Permissions and Security - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aleph and Datarails are categorized as Budgeting and Forecasting, Financial Analysis, Financial Close, and FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
Unique Categories
Aleph has no unique categories
Datarails is categorized as Cash Flow Management and Financial Reconciliation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aleph
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Datarails
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
27.0%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Financial Services
12.7%
Marketing and Advertising
7.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Other
33.3%
Financial Services
7.8%
Hospital & Health Care
7.0%
Manufacturing
5.7%
Oil & Energy
4.5%
Accounting
4.1%
Other
70.9%
Discussions
Aleph has no discussions with answers
Datarails has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
