Users report that InVision excels in its Ease of Setup with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to quickly implement a design workflow. In contrast, Flinto lacks this level of ease, which may lead to longer onboarding times.
Reviewers mention that InVision's Quality of Support is rated at 8.4, indicating a strong customer service experience. On the other hand, Flinto's support rating of 7.2 suggests that users may face challenges when seeking assistance.
G2 users highlight InVision's superior Collaboration Capabilities, scoring 8.3, which facilitates teamwork and feedback. Flinto, with a lower score of 7.5, may not provide the same level of collaborative features, potentially hindering team interactions.
Users on G2 appreciate InVision's robust Workflow Management features, scoring 8.3, which streamline project processes. Flinto's functionality in this area is less emphasized, which could affect project efficiency.
Reviewers say that InVision's Performance Tracking tools, particularly its dashboard capabilities, are highly effective for monitoring asset performance. Flinto, however, does not offer comparable performance tracking features, which may limit users' ability to analyze their design effectiveness.
Users report that InVision provides a wider array of Design Templates, enhancing the design process with ready-to-use options. Flinto's offerings in this area are more limited, which could restrict creativity and speed in design projects.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.