Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Opal Security 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hire2Retire
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (71.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (56.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
Star Rating
(68)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (71.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CyberArk Privileged Access ManagerOpal Security
Star Rating
(30)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (56.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opal SecuritySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that CyberArk Privileged Access Manager excels in its "Password Vault" feature, receiving a high score of 9.7, which reviewers mention provides robust security for sensitive credentials. In contrast, Opal Security's password management capabilities are perceived as less effective, with a score of 6.1.
- Reviewers mention that Opal Security shines in "Quality of Support," achieving an impressive score of 9.9, while CyberArk's support is rated lower at 8.2. Users on G2 appreciate Opal's responsiveness and helpfulness in resolving issues quickly.
- G2 users highlight that CyberArk's "Live session recording & playback" feature is a standout, scoring 9.3, which is crucial for compliance and security audits. However, Opal Security's equivalent feature is rated significantly lower at 4.7, indicating a gap in functionality.
- Users say that Opal Security's "Centralized Management" feature is highly rated at 9.5, making it easier for administrators to manage user access and policies. CyberArk, while also strong in this area with a score of 9.0, does not match the level of user satisfaction reported for Opal.
- Reviewers mention that CyberArk's "Approval Workflows" score of 8.8 is slightly lower than Opal Security's 9.1, indicating that users find Opal's workflow processes more intuitive and efficient for managing access requests.
- Users on G2 report that both products perform well in "Multi-Factor Authentication," with CyberArk scoring 9.2 and Opal at 8.9. However, reviewers note that CyberArk's implementation is more seamless, enhancing user experience during login processes.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
No pricing availableOpal Security
No pricing availableFree Trial
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
No trial information availableOpal Security
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
54
9.0
21
Ease of Use
8.2
56
8.6
21
Ease of Setup
6.9
40
8.8
17
Ease of Admin
8.1
42
9.0
18
Quality of Support
8.2
50
9.9
21
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
38
10.0
17
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
56
9.4
19
Features by Category
User on/off Boarding
Not enough data
10.0
9
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
10.0
7
User Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
Governance
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
9.2
6
Administration
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.1
6
Administration
9.0
37
8.6
12
8.8
36
9.1
13
8.4
34
8.9
12
8.1
35
8.3
10
8.6
37
9.5
11
8.4
34
9.6
14
Functionality
9.2
38
8.9
14
9.1
35
9.2
15
8.3
30
8.3
7
9.7
37
Not enough data
9.0
36
9.5
13
9.1
36
9.6
13
8.2
33
9.2
13
9.3
35
4.7
6
9.7
36
Feature Not Available
9.1
35
9.9
13
Monitoring
9.3
37
8.9
12
9.2
37
8.8
13
8.1
35
Not enough data
Reporting
9.2
35
8.2
13
8.0
35
8.5
10
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Opal Security are categorized as Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Unique Categories
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is categorized as SAP Store and AWS Marketplace
Opal Security is categorized as User Provisioning and Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Opal Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
14.5%
Banking
12.9%
Insurance
6.5%
Retail
4.8%
Financial Services
4.8%
Other
56.5%
Information Technology and Services
26.7%
Financial Services
20.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Computer & Network Security
10.0%
Internet
6.7%
Other
20.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has no discussions with answers
Opal Security has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
