Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Blueprint and Perforce ALM 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Archer Consulting Team
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (42.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Blueprint
Star Rating
(12)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about BlueprintPerforce ALM
Star Rating
(102)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Perforce ALMSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Helix ALM excels in Quality of Support with a score of 8.7, while Blueprint trails behind at 7.7. Reviewers mention that Helix ALM's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- Reviewers mention that Helix ALM offers superior Requirements Listing capabilities with a score of 9.3, compared to Blueprint's performance in this area. Users say that Helix ALM's structured approach to requirements management helps teams maintain clarity and focus throughout the project lifecycle.
- Users on G2 highlight Helix ALM's strong Traceability feature, scoring 8.8, which allows for better tracking of requirements through to testing. In contrast, Blueprint's traceability features are perceived as less robust, leading to potential gaps in project oversight.
- G2 users report that Helix ALM's Bug Monitoring capabilities are highly effective, with a score of 8.6, while Blueprint's offerings in this area are not as comprehensive. Reviewers mention that Helix ALM's bug tracking system integrates seamlessly with other project management tools, enhancing overall workflow.
- Users say that Helix ALM shines in Analytics with a score of 8.6, providing detailed insights into project performance. In contrast, Blueprint's analytics features are seen as less intuitive, making it harder for teams to derive actionable insights from their data.
- Reviewers mention that Helix ALM's Automated Creation & Testing feature, scoring 8.6, significantly streamlines the testing process, whereas Blueprint lacks similar automation capabilities, which can lead to increased manual effort and potential errors.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Blueprint
No pricing availablePerforce ALM
No pricing availableFree Trial
Blueprint
No trial information availablePerforce ALM
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
6.9
9
8.3
95
Ease of Use
7.5
8
7.8
95
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.2
71
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.4
63
Quality of Support
7.4
9
8.7
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.7
65
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
7.1
92
Features by Category
Tasks
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Projects
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Resource Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Project Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Project Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.6
14
Not enough data
8.8
13
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
8.7
14
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring - IT Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Regulatory Change Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Communication
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Procedural
Not enough data
8.6
7
Value Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Blueprint and Perforce ALM are categorized as Requirements Management
Unique Categories
Blueprint is categorized as IT Risk Management, Regulatory Change Management, Value Stream Management, and Project Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Blueprint
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Perforce ALM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
45.5%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Program Development
9.1%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Human Resources
9.1%
Other
18.2%
Computer Software
16.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.0%
Medical Devices
12.0%
Telecommunications
6.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
49.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Blueprint has no discussions with answers
What is Helix ALM used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from Perforce ALM
Helix ALM is used to manage requirements, issues, and all types of testing, for automated, end-to-end traceability. It's often used by organizations in...Read more
Perforce ALM has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
