When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found AWS WAF easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with AWS WAF overall.
Reviewers felt that AWS WAF meets the needs of their business better than Apache HTTP Server Project.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS WAF is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AWS WAF over Apache HTTP Server Project.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS WAF
No pricing available
Apache HTTP Server Project
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS WAF
No trial information available
Apache HTTP Server Project
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
46
8.8
127
Ease of Use
8.2
46
7.6
127
Ease of Setup
8.1
31
8.0
73
Ease of Admin
8.2
31
7.6
73
Quality of Support
8.7
42
7.4
108
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Web application firewalls are used for protection of web applications from owasp top 10 vulnerabilities basis on different CVEs. AWS WAF is nothing but...Read more
Unless you're looking to get into some real nitty-gritty with Apache, I recommend using StackOverflow for your questions. Generally speaking people are quite...Read more
Why apache is a process based server
1 Comment
CW
Apache has been around since 1995, a time when a process-based approach was sufficient. It has grown over the years and serves over 100 million websites so...Read more
What is Apache server explain main features of Apache server?
1 Comment
PM
Easy to manage webpages in a shared hosting setup, able to configure seperate settings for each web pages.Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.