Users report that COMSOL Multiphysics® excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 8.5, while Abaqus falls short with a score of 6.4, making COMSOL a preferred choice for those needing robust modeling capabilities.
Reviewers mention that the drawing tools in COMSOL Multiphysics® are rated at 8.9, significantly higher than Abaqus's 6.6, indicating that users find COMSOL's drawing capabilities more intuitive and effective for their design needs.
G2 users highlight that COMSOL's finite element analysis capabilities are rated at 9.4, compared to Abaqus's 8.8, suggesting that users appreciate the depth and accuracy of COMSOL's analysis features for complex simulations.
Users on G2 report that while both products offer fluid analysis, COMSOL Multiphysics® has a slight edge with a score of 8.7 over Abaqus's 8.2, indicating a preference for COMSOL in fluid dynamics applications.
Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Abaqus is rated higher at 8.1 compared to COMSOL's 7.8, suggesting that users may find better assistance and resources when using Abaqus.
Users say that COMSOL Multiphysics® provides better command clarity with a score of 8.3, while Abaqus scores 8.6, indicating that users may find Abaqus's commands slightly clearer, which can enhance user experience during complex simulations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing available
COMSOL Multiphysics®
No pricing available
Free Trial
Abaqus
No trial information available
COMSOL Multiphysics®
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
9.0
32
Ease of Use
7.5
38
6.9
32
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
7.8
26
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.