Furniture Manufacturing Software

The digital papers are actually expensive compared to the production cost of making these digital papers. I wish they increase more the number of colors from an image. The current maximum number of colors generated from image feels very limiting. I wish there is also a way to save workspace. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’m a traditional artist. Even though I’ve used Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Sketchbook, Corel Painter, ArtRage, and others, none of them really gave me that traditional feel when drawing or painting. Rebelle is the one that finally gave me the traditional experience I’d been looking for. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Replacing the blocks like in Revit. I would love if I could simply replace blocks. Like in Revit you can choose wall type by the wall category drop down, but in CAD you don’t have that option. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoCAD saves me a lot of time. The X-ref feature updates changes across drawings, Dynamic Blocks simplify reuse, and I can easily print quality drawings in any scale. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not found any negatives thus far and I have really tried to break it by opening all CAD versions I have going back 20 years on some multi level buildings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cost of the software was a huge factor as I can get the package for a once off budgetary amount and not have to keep paying forever. It allows me to service my clients with a professional item. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dislike Designcenter NX because it is hard to learn at first, needs a strong computer, and is expensive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Designcenter NX solves the problem of using many different tools for design, testing, and manufacturing by putting everything in one software. This helps me save time and work faster because I don’t need to switch between programs. It also reduces mistakes since any change updates everywhere. Overall, it makes my work easier, more organized, and more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it can be unstable with product add-ons going into major simulations, guess this could be expected but further development for that would be great as we use that a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Able to design fast, creating digital twins and model creations that improve the business much faster. Working together with Teamcenter share for cloud sharing also makes it easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s hard for me to think of any real downsides to Procreate. The one thing I do wish it had is some kind of vector mode. I realize that isn’t really what Procreate is intended for, but it could still be useful in certain situations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Procreate makes it easy to create digital artwork. It’s a useful tool for quickly getting ideas out and keeping momentum as I work. With Procreate, my creative workflow feels faster, smoother, and more streamlined overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Haven't found any issues so far Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Onshape solves my dependency on high-end hardware, letting me work from any device with a browser. Its parametric nature helps me reuse models for new projects, and I can handle complex assemblies without performance hiccups, even while traveling. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I don’t like about Altium Designer is that it can feel heavy and complex, especially for new users. The learning curve is steep, and sometimes simple tasks take multiple steps if you’re not already familiar with the software.

Another downside is that bugs can sometimes appear with no clear way to fix them, and there isn’t much information or guidance available to resolve these issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Altium Develop helps eliminate version confusion and makes collaboration much easier. It keeps track of changes, so I can always see who did what, and it speeds up design reviews and the process of getting feedback. Overall, it makes working on PCB projects feel less stressful, more organized, and easier to manage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is little bit laggy with Acad DWG having large number for solids and hatches, material rendering is not upto mark Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it solves all basic need of a mechanical+ architeural engineer need to conceptulaise the design and prepare a well document for engineering purposes, its trinity feature enables it to perform a powerfull role to collaborate all around Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Rebuild errors. I think SOLIDWORKS should integrate a system that can detect rebuild errors and help resolve the issue. Sometimes, while I’m applying commands, it shows rebuild errors, and after that I’m not able to find where the errors are coming from. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SOLIDWORKS helps reduce the cost of prototyping. With this software, I can create almost any part, choose materials using the Appearances section, and then run different types of analysis with SOLIDWORKS Simulation.

As a third-year mechanical engineering student, I regularly model parts and assemblies, which has really helped me improve my skills. Right now I’m working on a project where I design parts in SOLIDWORKS, convert them to an .stl file, and then print them on a 3D printer. Overall, it makes my work much easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What could be improved is, like, the different brush sizes and, like, the usability, you know, because, like, I have to select from the brush sizes, and, like, that could have been more intuitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Sketchbook because it integrates well with my tablet and mobile devices, allowing for more creativity compared to other software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The major factor is the 'bug splat". Despite its versions and performance have upgraded tremendously over the years, SketchUp is still prone to crashes when models become overly heavy with un-purged components.. Also, complex geometry cannot be easily created without third-party plugins. For a tool that started as free/affordable option, the recurring pro subscription pricing may feel steep for solo practitioners. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It creates a perfect bridge between 2D sketch and ideation and the final resulting 3D render. It can be seamlessly integrated into AutoCAD's workflow, AI's workflow and also as external exports for a cloud based softwares like Coohom. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I dislike about Autodesk Fusion is that it is highly dependent on an internet connection for sign-in and cloud features, which can be inconvenient when working with limited or unstable connectivity. Sometimes the software also feels resource-heavy, especially on mid-range systems, causing slowdowns during complex assemblies or simulations.

Another drawback is that some advanced features are locked behind paid plans, which can be limiting for students or individual users who want to explore deeper CAM or simulation capabilities. Occasional updates also change the interface slightly, which takes some time to adjust to.

And the last and most important drawback is its platform fees! Like paying 1 lakh + per year in India ,is I think can be difficult for some designers and engineers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Autodesk Fusion solves the problem of having to use multiple separate tools for design, testing, and manufacturing by bringing everything into one integrated platform.

From an electronics perspective, it helps in designing accurate enclosures, brackets, and mechanical parts for electronic projects such as sensor housings, control boxes, and PCB enclosures. Being able to visualize dimensions in 3D ensures that electronic components fit properly, reducing physical rework and material waste. This has helped me move from concept to a ready-to-fabricate design much faster. For general use, Fusion streamlines the entire design workflow by allowing quick modifications through parametric modeling and validating designs using basic simulation before manufacturing. This saves time, improves design accuracy, and boosts confidence before prototyping. Overall, it has made my project development process more efficient, organized, and reliable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I don’t like about artificial intelligence is that it is not always perfectly accurate and sometimes gives information that needs to be double-checked. It also cannot fully understand human emotions or personal situations like a real person can. Because of that, conversations can sometimes feel less natural, and you still need human judgment when using AI tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

MicroStation helps solve problems related to technical drawing, design accuracy, and project coordination. It allows us to create precise engineering drawings and manage complex infrastructure projects more efficiently. By using MicroStation, we reduce errors, improve collaboration between team members, and save time during the design and documentation process. This ultimately increases productivity and ensures higher quality project results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I didn’t like initially about Coohom was that the interface felt a bit overwhelming. Since the layout is different from some other design tools, it took me time to understand where certain settings and controls were located. In the beginning, this slowed down my workflow. I also felt that some features are not very intuitive at first. You sometimes have to try a few times or watch tutorials to fully understand how a specific tool works. For someone using it for the first time, that adjustment period can be slightly frustrating. Once I got used to it, things became easier, but the initial learning phase could definitely be smoother Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As an interior designer with around two years of experience, one of the biggest challenges I face is presenting ideas clearly to clients. Many clients find it difficult to imagine a space just by looking at 2D drawings or explanations. Coohom helps solve that problem by allowing me to create proper 3D designs and realistic renders that make the concept much easier to understand. It saves me time compared to doing everything manually. I can quickly build layouts, experiment with furniture placement, and adjust materials to show different options. This makes client discussions smoother because they can visually see the changes instead of just imagining them. The designs are quite accurate to a good extent, which helps in planning and giving better quotations. Another thing that has benefited me is that Coohom works well on both laptop and mobile. Sometimes I need to quickly show a design or check a project while I’m not in the office, and it runs smoothly. That flexibility really helps in dayto day work. One feature I genuinely find very useful is the refer and earn program. It’s actually a good initiative because as designers we often connect with other designers, contractors, or students. Being able to recommend a tool that I’m already using and getting some benefit from it is a nice advantage. It feels practical, not just a marketing gimmick. For me, Coohom solves the problem of visualization, client communication, and presentation quality. It helps me create better-looking interior concepts and explain them confidently. While no software is perfect, it has definitely made my design process more efficient and professional. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In Sketch mode, the snap lines can be a bit buggy at times, and they don’t always let me place a point exactly where I want. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I used to use a CAD program called TinkerCAD. It was pretty fun and easy to work with, but the engine just didn’t let me create the kind of detailed models I wanted. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In the beginning, interface feels little confusing because there are many tools and options on screen, so it takes some time to understand where things are. Sometimes while working on bigger images or multiple layers, performance can feel little slow on normal system, specially when many edits are open together. It is not a major problem but happens sometimes during longer editing work. Another small thing is that some advanced editing steps are not very easy for beginners and I had to watch few tutorials to understand them properly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helps me solve the problem of basic to medium level image editing without needing very expensive software. In my daily work I need to create health education posts, edit thumbnails, make before and after transformation images and prepare visuals for social media, so it helps me manage all this work in one place. earlier, small editing tasks like adding text, resizing images, cleaning background or adjusting brightness were taking more time because I had to use different tools. Now most of these things can be done in one software, which makes work more easy and organized.

it also helps in making transformation posts more clear and professional. I can properly arrange before and after images, add weight details and highlight important points so the content looks more understandable for viewers. Layer editing, crop, resize and text tools are very useful in daily work. It also supports different image formats, so sharing and reusing files becomes simple. overall, it saves time, improves content quality and helps me create better educational and social media content in a more practical way. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When I work on large assemblies, Inventor crashes suddenly, and sometimes there's no mouse movement showing. The model feature in drawings for exploded views is not working well. These issues may be resolved by upgrading the software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Inventor to create complex 3D parametric models and drawings, resolve issues in existing designs, and easily convert AutoCAD 2D drawings to 3D. Its versatility and interchangeability save me time and enhance productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about DraftSight is that some advanced features and customizations feel less polished compared to more established CAD platforms. Certain tools can be slower or less intuitive than expected, and occasional compatibility quirks appear when working with very complex DWG files. While none of these issues are deal‑breakers, they can interrupt the workflow at times. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DraftSight helps me streamline all my 2D drafting work by providing a reliable and efficient environment for creating and editing DWG files. It solves the problem of maintaining compatibility with partners who use different CAD platforms, ensuring smooth collaboration. Its clean interface and stable performance reduce time spent on repetitive tasks, which improves productivity and keeps projects moving efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main thing I dislike about AutoCAD is that it sometimes hangs because of its high system hardware requirements, which interrupts my workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoCAD LT helps me visualize and optimize space on the factory floor by translating 3D space into clear, straightforward 2D drawings, which is an important part of my role in my organization. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.