Writesonic Reviews & Product Details

We use writesonic mainly for our promotional content writing. As most of our instagram stories and reels needs a detailed caption so that they can get a good reach and customer traction. Writesonic help us in writing quality captions for our social media contents also it helps in sending personalized messages to our old clients whenever we need to reach out for follow ups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the major disadvantage of using writesonic is that the tone and style of the sentences look too general, and we are not able to send messages in the recipient’s native language. Also this software is little premium but does not provide any benefit in operations and staff management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Writesonic easily adapts to a variety of formats - blog intros, ads, product descriptions, landing page copy, email sequences, and social content. I especially appreciate the pre-built templates; they save time when starting new campaigns Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While overall quality is strong, a few outputs sometimes feel repetitive or generic. I often need to refine sections to add brand voice or specificity.

The SEO assistant works but isn’t as robust as some dedicated SEO writing tools — could benefit from deeper keyword integration and real-time optimization suggestions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Writesonic is an online based tool just like chat GPT, Gemini, grock and it is a professional tool that is mainly used by us for writing business contents like business emails, proposal letters, sale pitches, follow up messages etc. It is a reliable platform for writing quality content Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use writesonic on a daily basis, I liked this platform a lot but there are some major issue that makes me question my choice. As even after buying it's subscription plan they give word limit which forces the user to buy extra credits and this make it very costly and that's why we have started switching to chatgpt Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Writesonic regularly for SEO work, mainly for content drafting and site-related checks. The SEO tools like site audit and content suggestions are helpful when I need quick insights without switching between multiple platforms. It saves time during initial analysis and helps speed up content planning and optimization tasks. Also it helps in optimizing website for AI gen. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some features are still in beta, so results can feel a bit limited or inconsistent at times. For deeper technical SEO, I still need to rely on other tools. Also, understanding how to best use each feature takes some trial and error in the beginning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Writesonic is an ai based content generation software which helps us writing better business messages and emails for our clients. This software has free templates available that helps us in creating the professional contents easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

All the contents that writesonic creates sounds natural and professional but at the same time it will need human editing for perfection. I have also found some instances where we have found palgarism errors in the contents that it generated even after providing the right promts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Writesonic is a AI based assistant that helps us in writing text contents for our business. This platform just need clear prompts from our side and it creates the whole paragraphs, email, business documents, proposal plans, captions etc for our business just in few seconds just like chat gpt. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The quality of all the contents totally depends on the prompts that we provide from our side and their premium plan is also little costly for us. Sometimes I just feel that these contents are just like chat GPT only but we pay extra every month for its premium plan but didn't get any extra or premium feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Writesonic user interface is very easy to use. you just need an email id to login and get started. It is best for those who want to create content for seo marketing. It has more advance features like GPT 4 access. it is easily accessible via pc. currently I am on free plan use it for my seo projects. It is easy to integrate with other seo tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It seems buggy and some times if internet connection is a bit slow, it slow to load content. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Writesonic to generate high-quality content like blog posts, marketing copy, social media text, and product descriptions quickly and efficiently. What I like most about Writesonic is how quickly it generates clear, well-structured content. Features like multiple tone options, ready-made templates, and AI-powered suggestions are especially valuable because they help me create marketing and business content faster while keeping the quality consistent. Multiple tone options let me tailor content for different audiences, ready-made templates speed up writing for common use cases, and AI-powered suggestions help refine ideas and wording. I also find the initial setup of Writesonic very easy, with a simple sign-up process and an intuitive interface that made it quick to start creating content right away. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some outputs still require manual editing for accuracy or brand tone, especially for niche topics. Credit usage can feel restrictive on lower plans, and having more control over long-form structure and factual consistency would improve the overall experience. Writesonic could be improved by offering better fact-checking or source references, more customization for brand voice, and finer control over long-form content structure. Increasing credit flexibility, adding clearer usage insights, and improving consistency for technical or niche topics would also enhance the overall experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Writesonic for content generation for my website, especially for regular blogs. I appreciate their pre-promoted SEO tools because they take care of most of the work, so I don't have to instruct them to use H1 or other SEO elements like EEAT and schema. The content it generates is in-depth and high quality, much better than what I experienced with ChatGPT. When used with Claude models, Writesonic produces the best content for blogs. The initial setup was easy and not too technical. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Probably their AI overview is decent but lacks the detailed site visibility compared to others like Neil Patel. Also, adding an option to export in .md file would be convenient for uploading directly to GitHub. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Writesonic is its Chatsonic, which is connected to Google Search and provides real-time data. This means I never encounter errors like 'I only know things until 2023.' I also like the AI Article Writer 5.0 because it creates a 2000-word SEO-optimized blog post with just one click. This tool offers SEO-friendly integration with SurferSEO, which helps content rank on Google. The consistency of 'Brand Voice' also acts as a boon; you can teach it your style from your old content. Its versatility also satisfies me because I can fulfill more than one need with it, whether it's a blog post, an image, or a chatbot. Its practicality and easy-to-use interface, which can be learned without any technical training, greatly appeal to me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The pricing model can be a bit confusing and restrictive. The distinction between 'Premium' and 'Superior' quality words means you burn through credits much faster if you want the best output. For heavy users, the credits often run out sooner than expected, and the 'Unlimited' plan sometimes has fair-usage caps that aren't immediately obvious. When using the AI Article Writer to generate 2,000+ word posts, the AI sometimes repeats the same points in different sections, requiring manual editing. While it mimics style well, it still struggles with humor, sarcasm, storytelling, and deep empathy, requiring significant rewriting to add soul. While having an image generator inside the tool is convenient, the quality of Photosonic is not yet on par with specialized tools, with issues like distorted faces. While it supports 25+ languages, the quality drops slightly for languages other than English, with formal or awkward phrasing in languages like Hindi. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.