
I have been using Open Water daily for the past four years and will continue to do so.
The judging process is a great feature, allowing us to involve over 80+ experts who review more than 1,800 session proposals. This process lets us organize submissions by program categories and gives us the flexibility to choose, for instance, how many judges will review each proposal. Sessions can be assigned randomly at first, and then easily moved between judges as needed, ensuring that the right expert evaluates each proposal.
One of my favorite aspects of Open Water is its learning curve. The platform offers an excellent balance between responsive customer support and comprehensive resources for self-learning. This approach has enabled us to implement new features each year that improve our workflow and make the system even easier to use. I now only contact customer support when I encounter a significant issue, and their responses are always prompt and direct me to helpful resources. On this point, ease of of implementation is guaranteed.
In terms of value (money), Open Water is very flexible. It allows you to manage multiple programs at once and does not charge per application or participant, which adds to its versatility. While OW is often used for grant or scholarship management, we use it to collect session proposals for a conference focused on technology and human rights. The overall process is quite similar, and we collaborate with OW to refine our evaluation process to fit our needs.
Ease of integration is also great. You can use the integration's hub but this is an extra paid feature. We have used it and it is positive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Open Water could improve its dashboard features, as it can sometimes be difficult to easily view all the key data points for your program. For instance, seeing how many sessions have been submitted, completed, or are still in process is not always straightforward. However, this issue is limited to the dashboard, since OpenWater does offer strong reporting capabilities. It would also be helpful if a summary of the main data points from your program appeared directly on the main program page. As for the interface, it may have looked outdated until recently, but they are currently working on a redesign, which I am very much looking forward to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
At G2, we prefer fresh reviews and we like to follow up with reviewers. They may not have updated their review text, but have updated their review.
The reviewer uploaded a screenshot or submitted the review in-app verifying them as current user.
Validated through a business email account added to their profile
This reviewer was offered a nominal incentive as thanks for completing this review.
Invitation from G2 on behalf of a seller or affiliate. This reviewer was offered a nominal incentive as thanks for completing this review.






