OpenVPN Access Server Reviews & Product Details

I think what stands out the most is the ease of managing access to different servers, as the interface allows us to grant or restrict permissions to users in a very simple way.

Moreover, compared to other VPNs we have worked with, this one has offered us much more stable connectivity without impacting the performance of the user's equipment. This has also helped us alleviate the workload on their devices.

The price also seems like a better offer to us, and we can adjust it to our needs. Since we have a constant flow of users, both new and outgoing, we can manage the VPN's operating costs as needed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the only thing that might bother me is the "temporary" access to the administration portal. Since we have the Systems teams in custody and maintain a fairly strict security control, we sometimes need to make quick changes to resolve incidents. However, what delays us a bit is the access itself, as we would prefer to have a "Remember device" option, so it doesn't ask for a password every time we close and reopen the page.

Additionally, the downtime also bothers us a bit. Sometimes connectivity tests are carried out, and some parameters need to be modified, which take time to verify; therefore, being disconnected after a while can be quite annoying. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

OpenVPN Access Server has been a good fit for us because it sits in a nice middle ground between an overly simplified VPN product and a completely DIY OpenVPN deployment.

The UI is good for the day-to-day work, and most routine configuration can be handled without dropping to the command line. Once you get into more complicated configurations, however, you quickly find yourself working in Linux and troubleshooting services, certificates, packages, and configuration directly. I don't necessarily consider that a negative, but administrators should know that the friendly web UI doesn't eliminate the need to understand what's happening underneath it.

Integration and flexibility are probably the biggest strengths. It works well in an existing enterprise environment and gives an administrator quite a bit of control over how authentication, networking, certificates, and client access are handled.

Performance has been solid, and once the environment is configured correctly it mostly stays out of the way. High availability and failover are valuable features, but this is also where the complexity increases substantially. I would like to see the product give administrators better visibility into node health, replication/state, failover problems, and configuration inconsistencies.

From a pricing and ROI perspective, I think Access Server makes sense when you want a purpose-built remote-access VPN without buying an entire firewall/security platform just for VPN connectivity. The ability to run it on standard infrastructure is also valuable.

Support and onboarding are decent, particularly for a basic deployment. Documentation covers most common tasks, but troubleshooting unusual problems can send you down some fairly deep rabbit holes. Better diagnostic tooling would go a long way.

As for AI, it isn't something I currently associate strongly with the product, and that's fine. I would much rather see OpenVPN invest in useful operational intelligence than bolt on a generic chatbot. Give me automated log analysis, certificate-expiration warnings, configuration drift detection, authentication failure correlation, and actionable HA/failover diagnostics. Those are AI capabilities that would actually make an administrator's life easier.

Overall, I would recommend OpenVPN AS to organizations that want flexibility and don't mind having some Linux expertise available. It is easy to use when things are working, powerful when you need to customize it, but could be much better at telling you what is wrong when something isn't working. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My biggest complaint is the gap between how simple the product looks in the web interface and how complicated it can become when something goes wrong. Troubleshooting failover, certificates, upgrades, or package compatibility can require digging through Linux services and logs, and the error messages don't always make the root cause obvious. Better built-in diagnostics and health reporting would make administration significantly easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like how simple OpenVPN Access Server is. The admin page is pretty simple, and I don’t need a master’s degree to understand how to use it. I can keep track of all the users in my system and check for suspicious activity, which is really helpful. I also find full tunneling for specific users, websites, or endpoints useful. It lets me whitelist the VPN IP and easily access customer or internal endpoints that don’t connect to the VPN. I can connect to different company VPCs through one tunnel. I use AWS and Google Workspace SSO so users can get their profiles directly, and that has really helped adoption across the team. After the initial installation, it’s a great product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find that applying changes can be a bit delayed. Installing OpenVPN Access Server also has a little bit of complexity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to deploy and access, user friendly Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

OpenVPN Access Server is powerful and reliable, but there are a few areas that could be improved. The administration interface can feel somewhat dated and not as intuitive as newer VPN or zero-trust platforms, especially during initial setup. Some configuration options are technical and may require documentation or prior networking experience, which can slow down onboarding for smaller teams.

Pricing can also become a concern as the number of users grows, since the licensing model may feel expensive compared with alternatives like WireGuard-based solutions or cloud-native VPN options. Integrations are functional, but they are not always as seamless as expected with modern identity providers, monitoring tools, or cloud environments.

Performance is generally stable, but depending on configuration and server resources, throughput may not always match lighter VPN solutions. It would be helpful to see a more modern UI, simpler deployment guides, clearer pricing tiers, stronger built-in monitoring, and easier integration with cloud platforms and identity management systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it is easy to set up and manage. It provides secure remote access to company resources and helps users connect to the network from anywhere. I also like its centralized management, user access control and reliable connection. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

setup and configuration can be a bit challenging for beginners, especially when managing certificates and network settings. and user interface could also be more modern and user-friendly. Apart from that, it works well for secure remote access. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

OpenVPN Access Server is a rock solid VPN server. Deployment and management is easy. We're running it on multiple Linux distros in AWS and we never have issues. The flexible licensing model works well for our environment as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing about OpenVPN AS that we dislike. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

OpenVPN made easy. The full power of Open Source OpenVPN with the ease of a graphical UI.

Very responsive and high quality technical and sales support! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

High Availability setup takes some work and does not seamlessly fail over. Or maybe I need to spend some more time with the documentation, as this might already be solved in the many years we're running this setup now.

(Update: It has improved indeed, but for now we use the "If it works, don't fix it" strategy.) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the easy setup, reliable connectivity, and security. Installation and configuration are straightforward, and client setup is simple. Remote access is simple, and we can connect to our infrastructure from anywhere. I also appreciate the easier user management and cost-effectiveness, and that OpenVPN Access Server provides secure access to our internal infrastructure and cloud environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the UI could be more intuitive, and troubleshooting connectivity issues could be simpler. I’d also like clearer error messages and more detailed connection logs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that it offers a wide variety of countries to choose from for dedicated IP addresses, which lets us pick the best option for our specific use case. I also appreciate how easy it is to use, and that it runs quietly in the background while you work. On top of that, it’s great that the application is updated regularly, so it continues to improve with each update. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

OpenVPN is undoubtedly one of the best VPN services currently available. Another strong point is that their technical support is consistently available online to guide you and respond to any questions you may have. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about OpenVPN Access Server is how quickly it lets you deploy a secure remote-access VPN without getting lost in complex configuration. The web-based UI is clean and intuitive, so even when managing users, certificates, or access control, everything is centralized and easy to navigate. Compared to traditional VPN setups, it saves a lot of time during initial deployment and ongoing maintenance.

From a workflow perspective, the integration with directory services (like LDAP/Active Directory) is a big win—it simplifies user management and avoids the need to maintain separate credentials. The client provisioning is also very smooth; users can download pre-configured clients, which reduces support overhead significantly.

Performance-wise, it’s stable and reliable for day-to-day operations, even with multiple concurrent users. I’ve also found the flexibility in routing (split tunneling vs full tunnel) useful depending on the use case.

Another strong point is its balance between cost and value. You can start small and scale as needed, which makes it practical for both lab environments and production use. Plus, the documentation and community support are solid, so troubleshooting or expanding setups doesn’t feel overwhelming.

Overall, it has improved my workflow by reducing setup time, minimizing manual configuration, and making remote access management much more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One drawback of OpenVPN Access Server is that some advanced configurations still require CLI access, even though the web UI is generally user-friendly. For network engineers who want fine-grained control (routing tweaks, policy-based behavior, or deeper troubleshooting), switching between GUI and CLI can slow down workflows.

Another limitation is the licensing model. While it’s easy to start, costs can increase quickly as the number of concurrent users grows, which may not be ideal for larger deployments compared to some alternative VPN solutions.

Performance tuning options are somewhat limited in the UI as well. For example, optimizing throughput or handling high-load scenarios often requires manual adjustments and deeper knowledge, rather than being guided through the interface.

Additionally, logging and monitoring could be improved. The built-in logs are useful but not always detailed or easy to analyze for complex issues, especially without integrating external monitoring tools. More advanced analytics or built-in visualization would make troubleshooting faster.

Overall, while it’s reliable and easy to deploy, improving advanced configuration visibility, scaling cost efficiency, and enhancing monitoring features would make it even more powerful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.