Manus AI agent Pricing Overview

Manus AI agent Pricing Key Insights

Last updated on Jul 30, 2026


Manus AI agent offers 4 pricing editions, starting from $0 to $199. Manus AI agent pricing tiers are designed to support different usage levels and team sizes. Compare the Manus AI agent pricing table below to figure out the best fit for your needs. Some plans may require you to contact Meta for custom pricing.


Free — $0 / 1 User
Basic — $19 / 1 User Per Month
Plus — $39 / 1 Users Per Month
Pro — $199 / 1 User Per Month
Rated 2.4 / 5

*Pricing information is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations must be conducted with the seller.

Manus AI agent Alternatives Pricing

The following is a quick overview of editions offered by other Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps) Software

Product Price Features
LaunchDarkly
Developer
$0.00
Feature flagging for your passion project. Start for free; pay only when you exceed Developer tier limits
  • 1 project
  • 3 environments
  • 5 service connections per month
  • 1k contexts per month
  • 10k experimentation keys per month
Botpress
Free
FreePer Month
Includes:
  • AI usage included
  • 3 seats
  • 3 AI agents
  • Botpress Desk
  • Botpress Studio
Pay As You GoPer Month
New customers get $300 in free credits to spend on Vertex AI.
  • A unified UI for the entire ML workflow
  • Pre-trained APIs for vision, video, natural language, and more
  • End-to-end integration for data and AI
  • Support for all open source frameworks
  • End-to-end application development environment

Various alternatives pricing & plans

Pricing information for the above various Manus AI agent alternatives is supplied by the respective software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase any of these products must be conducted with the seller.

Manus AI agent Pricing Reviews

(2)
Verified User in Research
UR
Verified User in Research
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Powerful for Research, but Pricey"
4/5
What do you like best about Manus AI agent?

I use Manus AI agent to draft my research because I think it's more powerful than other options like Gemini and ChatGpt. It can scrap websites very well, perfectly understands the images in the research, and helps in drafting research papers. I like that it doesn't interact with or interrupt me between subtasks, and it doesn't require real-time responses, which allows me to work on other things while it does tasks for me. It saves time by opening and gathering a lot of sources quickly and provides a comprehensive summary and complete ideas. It works perfectly without interruptions, unless it's a wide research, and drafts well-structured overall meanings of research questions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Manus AI agent?

Manus AI agent is super expensive. I feel like the pricing model needs some adjustment because it's really costly. They give you only 1,000 credits at a time, which is not enough, especially for heavy tasks. It would require a lot of money to use it fully. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Business Supplies and Equipment
UB
Verified User in Business Supplies and Equipment
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Worst Company Experience: Business Data Lost, No Accountability, Unread Emails, Support Walked Away"
0/5
Describe the project or task Manus AI agent helped with:

In my experience, Manus ultimately failed to solve the most serious problem I encountered.

A service like this should protect continuity of work and provide reliable recovery when critical data is missing. Instead, when my business-critical project data and credits were affected, I received no clear technical resolution, no accountable case ownership, and no meaningful recovery outcome.

What was especially concerning was the lack of basic customer-case management. Even my formal support email remained without confirmed review, while the support process repeatedly asked for more evidence and then closed conversations before the underlying issue was resolved.

For me, the practical benefit was therefore undermined by the company’s inability to handle a serious data-loss incident responsibly. A tool that can help create business assets but cannot reliably support customers when those assets are at risk does not solve the core problem I need solved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about Manus AI agent?

This was one of the worst customer support experiences I have ever had. I have never seen a paid service repeatedly close support conversations in the middle of an unresolved case when the questions became difficult. My business-critical startup assets and credits were lost, yet after a week of submitting evidence, no one took clear ownership or provided a technical explanation.

I followed Manus’s official backup process exactly as instructed. The system showed the backup as completed, but the Task Data required for restoration was simply not there.

I then spent about a week dealing with Manus Support and submitted everything they requested:

screenshots

backup file details

OneDrive evidence

restoration status

screen recordings

project information

credit-loss evidence

And still, no one gave me a clear technical answer to the most basic question:

Why did Manus show a successful backup if the required Task Data was never actually available?

The support process made the situation even worse.

Two separate support conversations were closed while the issue was still unresolved. In one case, I was told to perform additional checks and reply, but the conversation was closed before I could continue. After reconnecting and submitting even more evidence, the second case was also closed without resolving the underlying problem.

In the end, I was told that Manus had informed users to back up their data.

That response is absurd in my case because I did back up my data. I followed Manus’s own instructions and relied on Manus’s own “completed” status.

What I lost was not some disposable test file. It was business-critical startup work, project history, development decisions, and credits built up over time.

After a week of fully cooperating, I was left with:

no Task Data

no technical explanation

unresolved lost credits

two prematurely closed support conversations

no meaningful resolution

no clear person or team taking responsibility

I am preserving the full evidence trail, including screenshots, videos, backup files, emails, and support transcripts, and I am now preparing to pursue this through formal channels.

At this point, this looks much more serious than an isolated inconvenience.

If multiple users followed the official backup process, saw “completed,” and still ended up without their Task Data, Manus needs to explain what failed in the backup/export system instead of pushing the issue back onto users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.