Top Rated Crownpeak DXM Alternatives
42 Crownpeak DXM Reviews
Overall Review Sentiment for Crownpeak DXM
Log in to view review sentiment.
Extremely flexible, both 'off the shelf' and as a 'headless' tool. Great interoperability with a wide range of 3rd party tools across CRM, PIM, DAM. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Some work required to get the absolute best from the tool for individual client bespoke implementations - although lower subscription costs compared to other tools balance this out. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
- Short turn-around times when delivering projects.
- Built-in Digital Quality tool (DQM) tool allows you to check the quality of content and any accessibility issues and immediately flag any issues before publishing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The platform can run slow at times and training can be limited but as as I know Crownpeak is working actively on that to improve the community platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Crownpeak does a very good job of compartmentalising sections of a website, and letting you control what content goes where, what widgets and code snippets, etc. We work with clients that need to pump out similar sites with variations, and its easy to make a very reactive template that you select which component you want from a dropdown, and the fields appear below to be published. It makes that very useful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In a lot of ways, Crownpeak feels unfinished. It is a little laggy to work with, especially with huge files. Similarly, a lot of aspects of source control that seem standard and like they should be implemented as a standard(various things that git do) (or even a git integration, come to think of it), don't exist and can cause issues. Crownpeak can also feel too ambitious, such as their own take at a serializer. It serialises json differently than the built in C# Visual Studio serializer which, to me, seems more standard, and it deals with ASCII characters differently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Works seamlessly alongside Lingotek to help our customers automate their translation process Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing as of yet - I'm new to Lingotek so have yet to experience/hear of any dislikes! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It uses c#, which is a language that I enjoy using. The component library is a step above just using plain templates. The Access API is decently designed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Poor performance in many respects--saving files in Visual Studio, saving components in the component library. Visual Studio extension has bugs, including that there's no syntax highlighting for my computer. Component editor doesn't have syntax highlighting or anything along those lines. In my opinion it should be possible to define templates via configuration, or declaratively, rather than imperatively. The documentation is lacking in examples and in some cases is simply wrong. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The personalization of the content is a strong feature. The fact that you can create personalized landing pages and do progressive profiling as well as A/B testing stands the tool out. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
the system performance is still an issue. Very slow, and publishing is cumbersome. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Crownpeak is so easy to use, while at the same time allows us to present relevant content to your consumers. We reviewed SiteCore, Adobe, Acquia and Crownpeak is by far one of the best, most cost efficient platforms on the market. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Not much, support is quick to reply when we have issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The back end of the CMS in terms of adding new pages and editing text and images is relatively simple with existing components. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We implemented Crownpeak in the past year. They have a severe resource constraint in their professional services department. Unless you have an in-house developer, and maybe even then, it is very difficult to execute on changes to templates, reporting, personalization, etc. in a timely manner. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The ability to open/edit multiple assets at a time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The CMS is a bit a slow. Features ported from previous versions of the CMS aren't well documented. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
