When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SecurityScorecard easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Upland Qvidian overall.
Reviewers felt that SecurityScorecard meets the needs of their business better than Upland Qvidian.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that SecurityScorecard is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of SecurityScorecard over Upland Qvidian.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SecurityScorecard
No pricing available
Upland Qvidian
No pricing available
Free Trial
SecurityScorecard
Free Trial is available
Upland Qvidian
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
76
8.4
132
Ease of Use
9.2
76
8.1
145
Ease of Setup
9.2
58
8.1
76
Ease of Admin
8.7
50
7.9
66
Quality of Support
8.8
74
8.7
124
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Apart from Third Party & Supplier Risk Management, How can we use other functionality of SS?
1 Comment
Official Response from SecurityScorecard
Hello Mohammed,
In addition to Third Party & Supplier Risk Management, SecurityScorecard can be used for several different use cases such as reputational...Read more
What is SecurityScorecard used for?
1 Comment
MD
We use it for 3rd party risk assessments. It offers organizations valuable insights into the vulnerabilities that exist in their own environments and their...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.