Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Quip and Scrivener 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Stacklist
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Crossware Email Signature
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dynasend
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (82.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$25/user
No pricing available
Quip
Star Rating
(1,103)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$25/user
Browse all 2 pricing plansScrivener
Star Rating
(86)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (82.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScrivenerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Scrivener excels in document creation with features like "Template Creation" rated at 9.0, allowing writers to easily set up their projects, while Quip's template functionality is rated lower at 8.9, which may limit customization options for users.
- Reviewers mention that Scrivener's "PDF Creation" feature is highly rated at 9.3, making it a preferred choice for users needing to export their work in a professional format, whereas Quip's PDF capabilities are not highlighted as a strong point.
- G2 users highlight Scrivener's superior "Multi-User Collaboration" rating of 9.4, indicating a robust environment for team projects, while Quip's real-time communication feature, rated at 9.2, is praised for facilitating immediate feedback among team members.
- Users on G2 report that Scrivener's "Document Editor" is rated exceptionally high at 9.8, providing a seamless writing experience, while Quip's editor, rated at 8.9, may not offer the same level of depth and functionality for writers.
- Reviewers mention that Scrivener's "Revision History" feature, rated at 8.9, allows users to track changes effectively, which is crucial for writers, while Quip's suggestion mode, rated at 8.9, is seen as a valuable tool for collaborative editing but may not be as comprehensive.
- Users say that Scrivener's strong performance on PC with a perfect score of 10.0 makes it a go-to for desktop users, while Quip's performance on PC is rated at 8.8, indicating it may not be as optimized for that platform.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Scrivener
No pricing availableFree Trial
Quip
No trial information availableScrivener
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
893
9.3
69
Ease of Use
8.7
895
7.9
71
Ease of Setup
9.1
225
7.9
15
Ease of Admin
8.8
208
9.2
8
Quality of Support
8.5
682
8.6
45
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
198
8.6
6
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
867
8.5
70
Features by Category
Document Creation
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.4
6
Workflow
Not enough data
6.4
6
Not enough data
6.9
8
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
6.9
6
Agentic AI - Screenwriting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Calculating
8.7
157
Not enough data
8.8
142
Not enough data
Insights
8.7
151
Not enough data
8.7
158
Not enough data
Editing
8.7
159
Not enough data
9.0
167
Not enough data
8.6
156
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
137
Not enough data
8.7
147
Not enough data
8.7
160
Not enough data
9.1
168
Not enough data
Design
8.7
48
8.5
12
8.8
48
8.1
13
8.5
48
6.8
12
Collaboration
9.4
53
5.3
6
9.2
50
4.8
7
File Types
8.6
47
9.2
13
8.4
47
8.9
12
8.5
36
4.3
7
Edit & Revise
8.7
53
8.3
11
8.8
43
5.9
11
8.9
51
9.4
13
Integrate & Embed
8.6
44
5.2
8
8.9
41
5.5
7
8.6
45
5.0
7
Operating System
8.8
37
9.8
11
9.1
39
9.8
9
8.5
29
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.8
12
Not enough data
8.2
12
Not enough data
7.8
12
Not enough data
7.5
12
Not enough data
7.2
12
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Document Creation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Quip
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Scrivener
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
14.6%
Information Technology and Services
14.0%
Marketing and Advertising
6.3%
Internet
4.7%
Education Management
3.5%
Other
57.0%
Writing and Editing
31.4%
Higher Education
8.1%
Publishing
7.0%
Information Technology and Services
4.7%
Libraries
3.5%
Other
45.3%
Discussions
What devices can I use Quip on?
2 Comments
Official Response from Quip
Quip is available for Mac (10.8+), Windows (7+), iPhone (iOS 8+), iPad (iOS 8+), Apple Watch, Android phones (4.0.3+), Android tablets (4.0.3+), and on the...Read more
How do I include graphs in Quip?
2 Comments
DB
It depends on the kind of graph you are trying to bring in. You can bring Lucid Charts and others in via integration. Read more
What is the best way to manage large product documents?
2 Comments
LL
Hi. If you want to be more confident in the correct execution of any documents in business, then I will give you advice to find out more information in the...Read more
How do i integrate this application with Google Drive?
2 Comments
MG
Here's a great tutorial on how to sync scrivener with google drive. https://simonkjones.com/how-to-sync-scrivener-with-a-chromebook/Read more
Scrivener has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
