Users report that Oracle Field Service Cloud excels in its Ease of Admin with a score of 8.8, making it easier for administrators to manage the system compared to SAP Field Service Management, which lacks a specific score in this area.
Reviewers mention that SAP Field Service Management shines in Client Notifications, scoring 9.0, which enhances customer communication during service appointments, while Oracle's score of 8.1 indicates room for improvement.
G2 users highlight the superior Booking capabilities of SAP Field Service Management, achieving a score of 9.2, which allows for more efficient scheduling compared to Oracle's score of 7.7, where users feel the process could be more streamlined.
Users on G2 report that Oracle Field Service Cloud has a strong Quality of Support rating of 8.0, but SAP Field Service Management outperforms it with a score of 8.5, indicating a more responsive support system.
Reviewers mention that both products have similar Analytics capabilities, each scoring 8.3, but users feel that SAP Field Service Management provides more actionable insights that can drive better decision-making.
Users say that Oracle Field Service Cloud's Calendar feature, with a score of 8.2, is functional but lacks the advanced features found in SAP Field Service Management, which scored 9.2, allowing for better resource allocation and scheduling efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Oracle Field Service Cloud
No pricing available
SAP Field Service Management
No pricing available
Free Trial
Oracle Field Service Cloud
No trial information available
SAP Field Service Management
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
112
8.8
23
Ease of Use
8.2
113
7.9
23
Ease of Setup
8.3
25
8.1
12
Ease of Admin
8.8
25
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.0
106
8.6
20
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.