Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Opentext functional Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementOpentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, OpenText UFT One, while still strong, does not match this level of performance in this area.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText UFT One offers superior ease of use with a score of 8.1 compared to OpenText ALM Quality Center's 7.8. This makes UFT One more accessible for teams looking to quickly adopt the software without extensive training.
- G2 users highlight the robust Bug Reporting features of OpenText ALM Quality Center, particularly in Tester Reports & Feedback, which scored 9.1. This is a significant advantage for teams focused on detailed bug tracking and resolution, whereas UFT One scored lower in this aspect.
- Users on G2 appreciate the strong customization capabilities of OpenText UFT One, which received an 8.1 rating. This flexibility allows teams to tailor the software to their specific testing needs, while ALM Quality Center's customization scored lower at 7.7.
- Reviewers say that OpenText ALM Quality Center shines in its Management features, particularly in Reporting and Version Control, both scoring 8.9. This is crucial for teams needing detailed insights and control over their testing processes, while UFT One does not provide the same level of management functionality.
- Users report that OpenText UFT One has a better overall Quality of Support, with a score of 8.5 compared to ALM Quality Center's 7.7. This indicates that UFT One may provide a more responsive and helpful support experience for users facing challenges.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableOpentext functional Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableOpentext functional Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.7
40
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.1
39
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
8.1
19
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.2
18
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.5
38
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.4
16
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.1
37
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
8.1
8
8.7
5
7.9
8
7.7
5
8.1
8
9.0
5
8.3
8
Automation
9.7
5
8.1
8
8.7
5
7.7
8
9.0
5
8.1
8
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and Opentext functional Testing are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Education Management
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
