Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Opentext functional Testing 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementOpentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingOpenText Application Quality Management vs Opentext functional Testing
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Opentext functional Testing easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Opentext functional Testing overall.
- Reviewers felt that Opentext functional Testing meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Application Quality Management.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Opentext functional Testing is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Opentext functional Testing over OpenText Application Quality Management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableOpentext functional Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableOpentext functional Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.7
40
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.1
39
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
8.1
19
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.2
18
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.5
38
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.4
16
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.1
37
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
8.1
8
8.7
5
7.9
8
7.7
5
8.1
8
9.0
5
8.3
8
Automation
9.7
5
8.1
8
8.7
5
7.7
8
9.0
5
8.1
8
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and Opentext functional Testing are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Education Management
4.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
