Compare .NET and Qt

At a Glance
.NET
.NET
Star Rating
(132)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$999 per year
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Qt
Qt
Star Rating
(54)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (49.1% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Qt
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that .NET excels in providing a consistent and reliable framework for building real-world applications, with users highlighting its strong performance and scalability as key advantages for enterprise-level projects.
  • Users say that Qt stands out for its ability to facilitate the development of professional graphical interfaces, allowing for a more agile and dynamic approach to UI design, which many find empowering.
  • Reviewers mention that .NET's extensive cross-platform support across Windows, Linux, and macOS, along with its rich set of libraries, enables developers to deliver applications faster, making it a flexible choice for various project types.
  • According to verified reviews, Qt's unique multiplatform guarantee and idiomatic API are frequently praised, with users appreciating the ease of integrating various functionalities like HTTPS servers and concurrency within a single framework.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that while .NET has a solid support structure, Qt users have noted a slightly better quality of support, which can be crucial for teams needing quick assistance during development.
  • Users report that .NET's implementation process is generally quick and intuitive, but some find that Qt's setup is even more user-friendly, making it easier for new developers to get started with their projects.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
.NET
BUSINESS
$999
per year
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Qt
No pricing available
Free Trial
.NET
No trial information available
Qt
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
116
8.6
46
Ease of Use
8.1
120
8.4
46
Ease of Setup
8.0
74
8.6
14
Ease of Admin
8.3
41
8.3
11
Quality of Support
8.2
113
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
40
7.8
10
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
115
8.2
46
Features by Category
Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Mobile Development FrameworksHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
IoT Development ToolsHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Development PlatformsHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
8.4
41
8.5
8
Functionality
8.5
37
9.0
7
8.7
25
8.1
6
8.5
26
8.6
6
8.5
24
8.3
6
8.4
20
8.9
6
8.5
21
8.6
6
8.0
23
8.1
6
App Monetization PlatformsHide 21 FeaturesShow 21 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advertising - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Mobile Development PlatformsHide 3 FeaturesShow 3 Features
8.2
25
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
7.9
16
Not enough data
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
.NET
.NET
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
43.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
28.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.8%
Qt
Qt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
49.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
28.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
22.6%
Reviewers' Industry
.NET
.NET
Computer Software
24.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.8%
Banking
4.0%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
41.6%
Qt
Qt
Computer Software
28.3%
Information Technology and Services
7.5%
Telecommunications
5.7%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
.NET
.NET Alternatives
Xcode
Xcode
Add Xcode
Android Studio
Android Studio
Add Android Studio
Firebase
firebase
Add Firebase
Ionic: An OutSystems Company
Ionic: An OutSystems Company
Add Ionic: An OutSystems Company
Qt
Qt Alternatives
Xcode
Xcode
Add Xcode
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Add Visual Studio
Ionic: An OutSystems Company
Ionic: An OutSystems Company
Add Ionic: An OutSystems Company
Eclipse
Eclipse
Add Eclipse
Discussions
.NET
.NET Discussions
Is xamarin form good?
1 Comment
Nishant S.
NS
Yes, Absolutely I prefere to develop Xamarin Form instead of all other hybrid and native application development toolRead more
Which is best MVVM framework for Xamarin.Forms and What is future of Xamarin?
1 Comment
SH
The best MVVM Frame work is FreshMVVM, sure the Xamarin have a great future in cross-platform development, in this lead the next step is MAUI, which will...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
.NET has no more discussions with answers
Qt
Qt Discussions
What is Qt used for?
1 Comment
Pier-Antoine G.
PG
Cross-platform application development, in C++, python, QMLRead more
Is Qt Creator IDE free?
1 Comment
Simon P.
SP
QT Creator is the development IDE, you can use the IDE however the QT libraries are only free for open source development which means if you use the open...Read more
What is the use of Qt Creator?
1 Comment
Simon P.
SP
It’s a multi-platform Développement IDE available for windows, Linux, macOS, android and others.Read more