Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Fortra Brand Protection and Mimecast Advanced Email Security 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sublime Email Security Platform
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyberint, a Check Point Company
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.6% of reviews)
Mid-Market (68.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Fortra Brand Protection
Star Rating
(35)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Fortra Brand ProtectionMimecast Advanced Email Security
Star Rating
(315)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (68.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Mimecast Advanced Email SecuritySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Mimecast Advanced Email Security excels in its Anti-Malware functionality, receiving a score of 9.3, while PhishLabs offers a slightly lower score of 8.7 in the same category, indicating a stronger performance in malware detection for Mimecast.
- Reviewers mention that Mimecast's Quarantine feature is highly effective, scoring 9.0, which allows users to manage suspicious emails efficiently. In contrast, PhishLabs also scores 9.0, but users note that Mimecast's interface for managing quarantined emails is more user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that Mimecast's Advanced Threat Intelligence/Protection is robust, scoring 9.0, which provides comprehensive protection against evolving threats. PhishLabs, while effective, scores lower at 8.0, suggesting that Mimecast may offer more proactive threat management capabilities.
- Users on G2 report that Mimecast's Reporting features, with a score of 8.5, provide detailed insights into email security metrics, whereas PhishLabs, scoring 8.3, is noted for its less comprehensive reporting capabilities, which may limit visibility into security incidents.
- Reviewers mention that Mimecast's Email Integration Support scores 8.4, making it easier to integrate with various email clients, while PhishLabs, with a score of 9.1 in Email Clients, is praised for its compatibility but lacks the same level of integration support.
- Users say that Mimecast's Ease of Use is rated at 8.0, which some find slightly less intuitive compared to PhishLabs' score of 8.7, indicating that PhishLabs may offer a more user-friendly experience for new users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Fortra Brand Protection
No pricing availableMimecast Advanced Email Security
No pricing availableFree Trial
Fortra Brand Protection
No trial information availableMimecast Advanced Email Security
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
22
9.0
248
Ease of Use
8.7
21
8.0
254
Ease of Setup
8.2
14
7.9
203
Ease of Admin
9.0
10
7.9
204
Quality of Support
8.9
19
8.4
242
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
11
8.7
203
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
20
8.8
243
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.0
117
Not enough data
8.4
119
Not enough data
8.2
117
Not enough data
8.2
101
Maintenance
Not enough data
8.1
116
Not enough data
8.9
121
Not enough data
8.5
108
Not enough data
8.6
115
Security
Not enough data
9.0
130
Not enough data
8.2
110
Not enough data
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.8
122
Not enough data
8.8
124
Not enough data
7.7
88
Identification
5.5
10
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
Enforcement
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.5
112
Not enough data
8.6
124
Not enough data
9.1
127
Not enough data
8.9
127
Detection
Not enough data
8.3
115
Not enough data
8.5
119
Not enough data
8.9
126
Protection
Not enough data
9.0
125
Not enough data
9.0
129
Not enough data
9.1
133
Agentic AI - Intelligent Email Protection
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
133
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
133
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
133
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
131
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
131
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
126
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
129
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
123
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
130
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Secure Email Gateway
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
Digital Risk Protection (DRP) PlatformsHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management - Digital Risk Protection (DRP) Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Incident Response Digital Risk Protection (DRP) Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Digital Risk Protection (DRP) Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Orchestration
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Information
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Personalization
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Threat Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Fortra Brand Protection and Mimecast Advanced Email Security share no categories
Unique Categories
Fortra Brand Protection is categorized as Dark Web Monitoring, Brand Protection, Threat Intelligence, and Digital Risk Protection (DRP) Platforms
Mimecast Advanced Email Security is categorized as Intelligent Email Protection, Cloud Email Security, Secure Email Gateway, and Browser Isolation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Fortra Brand Protection
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Mimecast Advanced Email Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
22.9%
Information Technology and Services
17.1%
Computer Software
14.3%
Financial Services
5.7%
Banking
5.7%
Other
34.3%
Legal Services
9.4%
Information Technology and Services
7.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Construction
4.5%
Computer Software
4.2%
Other
67.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Fortra Brand Protection has no discussions with answers
Has anyone implemented ingesting the Audit logs from Mimecast into Graylog?
3 Comments
DB
Yes, I have a working example. We also sell this as a featureRead more
What is Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection used for?
2 Comments
DG
Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection is used to defend against phishing, malware, ransomware, and impersonation attacks.... It provides...Read more
Mimecast Advanced Email Security has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
