Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare McGraw-Hill Connect and MindTap 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Speakable
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Synap
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (39.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
McGraw-Hill Connect
Star Rating
(176)3.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about McGraw-Hill ConnectMindTap
Star Rating
(34)2.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MindTapSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that MindTap's question variety is impressive, scoring 9.0, which allows for diverse assessment options, while McGraw-Hill Connect offers a solid 8.0 in real-time assessment, indicating a focus on immediate feedback.
- Reviewers mention that McGraw-Hill Connect excels in personalized learning paths with a score of 7.1, providing tailored experiences for students, whereas MindTap's score of 6.7 suggests it may not be as effective in this area.
- G2 users highlight that McGraw-Hill Connect's automated grading feature, scoring 7.9, streamlines the grading process, while MindTap's lower score indicates potential challenges in this functionality.
- Users on G2 appreciate MindTap's pre-made content scoring 8.6, which is slightly higher than McGraw-Hill Connect's 8.5, suggesting that both platforms offer valuable resources, but MindTap may have a slight edge in this category.
- Reviewers mention that McGraw-Hill Connect's analytics dashboard is user-friendly, scoring 7.4, which helps educators track student progress effectively, while MindTap's score of 6.7 indicates room for improvement in reporting and analytics.
- Users say that McGraw-Hill Connect's course management features, particularly in course authoring and course access, are robust, scoring 7.8, which may enhance the overall teaching experience compared to MindTap's offerings.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
McGraw-Hill Connect
No pricing availableMindTap
No pricing availableFree Trial
McGraw-Hill Connect
No trial information availableMindTap
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
7.9
142
6.3
24
Ease of Use
7.3
142
6.0
27
Ease of Setup
7.5
25
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.5
24
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.3
130
6.2
23
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
24
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
140
5.7
27
Features by Category
Assessment delivery
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
Grading and reporting
7.9
7
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
6.7
7
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
Administration
6.3
5
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
Learning Content
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
7.3
13
Not enough data
6.5
11
Not enough data
Personalization
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting Analysis
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Course Management
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Integration
6.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Customer Assistance
6.7
6
Not enough data
Platform Customization
6.7
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Online Learning Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Features
8.5
10
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
8.1
19
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
8.2
18
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
McGraw-Hill Connect and MindTap are categorized as Online Learning Platform
Unique Categories
McGraw-Hill Connect is categorized as Digital Learning Platforms, Study Tools, Assessment, and Classroom Management
MindTap has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
McGraw-Hill Connect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
MindTap
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
38.3%
Education Management
24.6%
E-Learning
12.0%
Primary/Secondary Education
6.6%
Accounting
3.0%
Other
15.6%
Higher Education
36.4%
E-Learning
15.2%
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Education Management
9.1%
Computer Software
6.1%
Other
21.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
How easy it is for students to get access at home?
3 Comments
JV
It isn't always consistent and even if they can access it they'll wish they never had because this is an awful program.Read more
MindTap has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
