Users report that Kinsta excels in quality of support, with a score of 9.7, while Salesforce Heroku lags behind at 7.9. Reviewers mention that Kinsta's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, making it easier for users to resolve issues quickly.
Reviewers say that Kinsta's backup and recovery features are top-notch, scoring 9.6, compared to Salesforce Heroku's 8.4. Users appreciate Kinsta's automated backups and easy restoration process, which provides peace of mind for website management.
G2 users highlight Kinsta's performance in caching, scoring 9.4, which significantly enhances website speed. In contrast, Salesforce Heroku's performance in this area is not as strong, leading to slower load times according to some reviewers.
Users on G2 mention that Kinsta offers superior site management capabilities, scoring 9.4, while Salesforce Heroku's site management features are less intuitive, resulting in a score of 8.9. This difference can impact the ease of managing multiple sites effectively.
Reviewers mention that Kinsta's infrastructure security is robust, with a score of 9.7, while Salesforce Heroku's security features, although decent at 8.9, do not provide the same level of assurance. Users appreciate Kinsta's proactive measures against threats.
Users say that Kinsta's language support is impressive, scoring 9.2, which is beneficial for international users. Salesforce Heroku, with a score of 8.4, does not offer the same breadth of language options, which can limit accessibility for some users.
Thank you, Tim, for your suggestions! 🙌
We take note and consider every comment or observation regarding new or already existing features, and we're...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.