Users report that Strapi excels in its Content Repository feature, scoring 8.1, which allows for efficient content management and organization. In contrast, KeystoneJS shines with a higher score of 9.3, indicating a more robust and user-friendly content repository experience.
Reviewers mention that Strapi's Content Authoring capabilities are rated at 8.6, providing a solid experience for creating and managing content. However, KeystoneJS falls slightly behind with a score of 7.7, suggesting that users may find Strapi's authoring tools more intuitive and effective.
G2 users highlight that KeystoneJS offers superior Content Scheduling features, scoring 8.5 compared to Strapi's 7.4. This indicates that users may find it easier to plan and automate their content publishing with KeystoneJS.
Users on G2 report that Strapi's Quality of Support is rated at 8.5, which is commendable, but KeystoneJS outperforms it with a score of 9.0, suggesting that users may receive more timely and effective assistance when using KeystoneJS.
Reviewers mention that Strapi's SEO capabilities are rated at 8.3, which is beneficial for content visibility. However, KeystoneJS significantly lags behind with a score of 6.7, indicating that users may find Strapi more effective for optimizing their content for search engines.
Users say that Strapi's API / Integrations feature is rated at 8.6, providing a good level of flexibility for developers. In contrast, KeystoneJS excels with a score of 9.4, suggesting that it offers more extensive and easier integration options for various applications.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.