G2 reviewers report that Jellyfish excels in providing a clear view of team productivity, with users appreciating features like ticket tracking and PR metrics. One user highlighted how it simplifies understanding insights without the need to sift through complicated reports.
Users say that LinearB offers a robust platform for detailed statistics, allowing teams to see granular data. Reviewers noted its effectiveness in integrating with tools like GitLab and Jira, which helped them quickly adapt health metrics into their processes.
According to verified reviews, Jellyfish has a significantly higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting its strong performance in user experience and support. Users have praised its ability to align development work with business investments, enhancing data-driven decision-making.
Reviewers mention that while LinearB has a slightly higher star rating, it has fewer recent reviews, which may indicate less current user engagement. This could affect the reliability of its feedback compared to Jellyfish, which has a more substantial volume of recent reviews.
Users highlight Jellyfish's superior quality of support, with many noting the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In contrast, while LinearB's support is rated well, it doesn't quite match the high praise Jellyfish receives.
G2 reviewers indicate that Jellyfish's ease of use is slightly lower than LinearB's, but users still find it intuitive enough for daily operations. The simplicity of Jellyfish's interface allows teams to focus on productivity metrics without unnecessary complexity.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.