Users report that InVision excels in its collaboration capabilities, allowing teams to work together seamlessly on design projects, while UXPin's collaboration features are noted to be less intuitive, making it harder for teams to communicate effectively.
Reviewers mention that InVision's design templates are extensive and user-friendly, providing a solid foundation for new projects, whereas UXPin's templates are seen as limited, which can hinder the initial design process.
G2 users highlight that InVision's user interface testing tools are robust and provide valuable insights, while UXPin's testing features are considered basic and may not meet the needs of more advanced users.
Users on G2 report that InVision's feedback communication tools are highly effective, allowing for easy collection and implementation of user feedback, whereas UXPin's feedback system is described as cumbersome and less efficient.
Reviewers say that InVision's workflow management is superior, enabling users to track project progress and manage tasks effectively, while UXPin's workflow features are often seen as lacking in functionality.
Users say that InVision's educational resources are comprehensive and helpful for onboarding new users, while UXPin's resources are perceived as insufficient, making it challenging for new users to get up to speed quickly.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.