Compare GitLab and Invicti (formerly Netsparker) 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (48.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GitLab
Star Rating
(875)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabInvicti (formerly Netsparker)
Star Rating
(68)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Invicti (formerly Netsparker)Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitLab excels in providing an integrated platform for development, combining source control, CI pipelines, security scanning, and deployment automation. Users appreciate that it reduces the need for multiple tools, making daily development smoother and less mentally taxing.
- Users say Invicti (formerly Netsparker) stands out for its user-friendly reporting capabilities, with easy-to-read and well-formatted reports that are particularly useful for ISO certifications. This feature simplifies compliance processes, making it a valuable tool for organizations focused on regulatory standards.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's user interface is highly intuitive, facilitating tasks like code searching and managing pipelines. This ease of use is a significant advantage for teams looking to streamline their workflows and enhance productivity.
- According to verified reviews, Invicti is praised for its quick setup and simplicity, allowing users to conduct regular website tests with minimal hassle. This efficiency is particularly beneficial for teams that need to maintain consistent security checks without extensive overhead.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while GitLab has a strong overall satisfaction score, it faces challenges in areas like ease of setup compared to Invicti. Users have noted that Invicti's setup process is more straightforward, which can be a deciding factor for teams with limited resources.
- Users report that both platforms have strong support, but Invicti receives higher marks for its quality of support and responsiveness. This aspect is crucial for teams that require timely assistance to resolve issues and maintain their security posture effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableInvicti (formerly Netsparker)
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
663
9.1
58
Ease of Use
8.7
666
9.1
58
Ease of Setup
8.6
226
9.1
48
Ease of Admin
8.6
172
9.2
46
Quality of Support
8.5
527
8.9
58
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
147
9.6
44
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
630
10.0
54
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
18
Not enough data
9.5
21
Not enough data
9.0
21
Risk Analysis
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.2
22
Threat Protection
Not enough data
7.9
13
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Administration
8.7
124
Not enough data
8.9
131
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
130
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
133
Not enough data
9.0
122
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
9.0
17
Analysis
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.7
17
Testing
Not enough data
7.6
12
Not enough data
8.6
15
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
9.3
17
Administration
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
Testing
8.8
28
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
25
8.2
21
8.9
24
8.3
20
Analysis
8.5
24
8.9
28
9.2
24
9.2
26
8.8
24
Feature Not Available
8.9
24
9.3
28
9.0
24
7.5
17
Testing
8.6
23
7.1
19
9.1
23
8.5
23
8.9
22
8.4
23
9.0
21
9.1
20
9.0
20
8.6
21
9.1
21
7.5
20
Administration
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.7
75
Not enough data
8.8
81
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
79
Not enough data
8.4
72
Not enough data
9.0
79
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
8.6
71
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.6
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
18
|
Verified
Network
Not enough data
8.7
14
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
11
|
Verified
Application
Not enough data
8.2
15
Not enough data
8.2
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
18
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
215
Not enough data
9.0
218
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.8
203
Not enough data
8.4
193
Not enough data
8.9
211
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
139
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
8.6
140
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
136
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
135
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.8
71
Not enough data
8.7
67
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
64
Not enough data
9.0
61
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Security Testing
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Management
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
148
Not enough data
8.5
136
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
153
Not enough data
8.8
151
Not enough data
8.6
141
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
157
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
9.0
158
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
226
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
204
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.9
215
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
215
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
198
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.8
13
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
117
Not enough data
8.6
112
Not enough data
8.4
112
Not enough data
Security
8.0
101
Not enough data
8.4
101
Not enough data
9.0
110
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
39
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.9
37
Not enough data
Value Management
9.0
39
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.9
40
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and Invicti (formerly Netsparker) are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
Invicti (formerly Netsparker) is categorized as Penetration Testing, Website Security, API Security, Vulnerability Scanner, Static Code Analysis, Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST), and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
24.2%
Internet
4.0%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.7%
Computer Software
12.5%
Telecommunications
10.9%
Financial Services
9.4%
Information Technology and Services
7.8%
Computer & Network Security
6.3%
Other
53.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
What is the difference between Netsparker Desktop and Netsparker Cloud?
1 Comment
Official Response from Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
To start off with, as the name implies, Netsparker Cloud is an online web application security scanner and Netsparker Desktop is a Windows software scanner....Read more
What is a Scan Policy?
1 Comment
Official Response from Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Scan policies in Netsparker allow you to save a specific Netsparker configuration setup so you do not have to configure the scanner each time you scan a...Read more
What are the different vulnerability severities in Netsparker?
1 Comment
Official Response from Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Netsparker web application security scanner scans for a wide variety of vulnerabilities in websites, web applications and web services.
Each vulnerability...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
