Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Essentials and symplr Provider 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MedTrainer
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Year
Essentials
Star Rating
(41)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Essentialssymplr Provider
Star Rating
(22)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Essentials excels in Workflow Management - Health Care Credentialing with a score of 9.0, highlighting its intuitive interface and seamless integration capabilities, while symplr Provider lags behind at 7.9, with reviewers mentioning difficulties in navigating its workflow features.
- Reviewers mention that Essentials offers superior Contract Management - Health Care Credentialing, scoring 8.7, which users appreciate for its robust tracking and reporting functionalities, whereas symplr Provider's score of 6.1 indicates a lack of comprehensive features in this area.
- G2 users note that Essentials has a higher Ease of Use rating at 8.4 compared to symplr Provider's 7.9, with many reviewers praising its user-friendly design that simplifies the onboarding process for new users.
- Users on G2 highlight that Essentials provides better Quality of Support with a score of 7.9, as many reviewers appreciate the responsive customer service, while symplr Provider's score of 8.1 suggests a more favorable experience, but with less consistency in support availability.
- Reviewers say that Essentials shines in Compliance - Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) with a score of 8.6, which users find essential for maintaining regulatory standards, while symplr Provider does not have a comparable score in this area, indicating potential gaps in compliance features.
- Users report that Essentials has a more favorable Product Direction rating of 7.5, suggesting a commitment to continuous improvement, while symplr Provider's lower score of 5.6 raises concerns about its future development and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Essentials
No pricing availablesymplr Provider
Core
Contact Us
Per Year
Get an in-depth look at our cloud-based physician credentialing solution built by and for the medical staff office.
- Provider Profile enables a quick view and status of files being processed, in addition to full practitioner information
- Leverage rules-driven primary source verification and automated workflows
- Automated license and exclusion monitoring saves time and facilitates compliance with regulatory standards
Free Trial
Essentials
Free Trial is available
symplr Provider
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
31
8.2
18
Ease of Use
8.2
31
7.8
19
Ease of Setup
5.9
9
7.0
9
Ease of Admin
7.0
9
8.5
8
Quality of Support
7.6
26
8.1
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.2
9
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
7.2
29
5.2
17
Features by Category
Workflow Automation
7.5
6
Feature Not Available
7.8
6
7.9
14
7.4
7
8.0
14
7.9
8
7.3
13
Compliance
8.6
7
7.8
12
8.6
7
7.2
12
8.6
7
7.8
12
Verification
8.3
8
8.2
14
8.1
8
8.1
14
7.8
6
6.5
13
Document Management
7.5
6
6.9
14
7.4
7
8.1
14
8.3
7
7.6
13
Clinical
7.6
7
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Financial
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Efficiency
8.5
10
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
Accuracy
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Network Management
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
6.0
10
Data Management
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Essentials and symplr Provider are categorized as Health Care Credentialing and Provider Data Management (PDM)
Unique Categories
Essentials is categorized as Revenue Cycle Management and Healthcare Claims Management
symplr Provider has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Essentials
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
symplr Provider
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Medical Practice
46.3%
Hospital & Health Care
36.6%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
7.3%
Mental Health Care
4.9%
Marketing and Advertising
2.4%
Other
2.4%
Hospital & Health Care
86.4%
Medical Practice
4.5%
Insurance
4.5%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
4.5%
‐
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What insurances use availity?
2 Comments
AB
Anthem, Ambetter, Amerigroup, Humana, Florida Blue, BCBS, BEacon, Blue Medicare Advantage, Asuris, Bright Healthcare, Peachstate, Primera, healthscope, MagellanRead more
What is availity used for?
1 Comment
JL
With Essentials, you can check eligibility, submit and receive auths and referrals, submit claims, get claim status and receive electronic remittances for...Read more
How much does it cost to use availity?
1 Comment
JL
Availity Essentials is free for providers to use.
With Essentials, you can check eligibility, submit and receive auths and referrals, submit claims, get...Read more
symplr Provider has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
