Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare EMQX and Qt 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1oT
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Opti Digital
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Onomondo
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Pay As You Go Per Year
No pricing available
EMQX
Star Rating
(22)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Pay As You Go Per Year
Browse all 5 pricing plansQt
Star Rating
(53)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QtSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Qt excels in its cross-platform capabilities, allowing developers to create applications for various operating systems seamlessly, while EMQX is praised for its high-performance messaging capabilities, particularly in IoT applications.
- Reviewers mention that EMQX's ease of use is highlighted by its intuitive dashboard and straightforward configuration, which users find beneficial for managing MQTT brokers, whereas Qt's interface can be more complex for beginners.
- G2 users indicate that EMQX has a strong focus on enterprise-level features, such as scalability and security, which are essential for large organizations, while Qt is more favored by small businesses looking for cost-effective solutions.
- Users on G2 report that both products offer solid support, but Qt's community-driven support is often seen as more accessible for smaller teams, while EMQX provides dedicated support options that enterprise users find invaluable.
- Reviewers say that the product direction for EMQX is highly rated, with a 10.0 score reflecting its commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates, while Qt's direction, though positive, is slightly less enthusiastic at 8.1.
- Users mention that the flexibility of EMQX's pricing model, particularly its "Pay As You Go" option, is appealing for businesses that want to scale their usage without upfront costs, contrasting with Qt's more traditional pricing structure.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
EMQX
EMQX Cloud （Standard）
Pay As You Go
Per Year
NO Coding, Saas & On-premise solution.Billed Hourly: Start at $ 0.18 per hour
- Scale as you need, pay as you go
- Flexible and rich IoT data integration up to 30+ choices
- Run in 17 regions across AWS, GCP, and Microsoft Azure
Qt
No pricing availableFree Trial
EMQX
Free Trial is available
Qt
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
10
8.5
45
Ease of Use
9.2
10
8.4
45
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.5
13
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.3
11
Quality of Support
8.3
10
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.8
10
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
10
8.2
45
Features by Category
Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Systems Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
IoT Capabilities
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Industrial IoT
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Platform - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advertising - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
EMQX and Qt are categorized as IoT Platforms
Unique Categories
Qt is categorized as Application Development Platforms, Component Libraries, IoT Development Tools, C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE), Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE), App Monetization Platforms, Mobile App Debugging, Mobile Development Frameworks, Mobile Development Platforms, and ALM Software
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
EMQX
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
27.3%
Hospitality
13.6%
Online Media
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Wholesale
4.5%
Other
36.4%
Computer Software
28.8%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Telecommunications
5.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.8%
Higher Education
5.8%
Other
46.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
EMQX has no discussions with answers
What are the primary benefits of QtCreator?
1 Comment
LR
QtCreator has many benefits:
+ It is stable mature software being continuously developed and maintained following best practices since 1995.
+ It has...Read more
What is the use of Qt Creator?
1 Comment
SP
It’s a multi-platform Développement IDE available for windows, Linux, macOS, android and others.Read more
Is Qt Creator IDE free?
1 Comment
SP
QT Creator is the development IDE, you can use the IDE however the QT libraries are only free for open source development which means if you use the open...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
