Users report that Dacast excels in its Multi-Platform Streaming capabilities, allowing seamless broadcasting across various devices, while Castr is noted for its Embeddable features that enhance user engagement on websites.
Reviewers mention that Dacast's Quality of Support is rated lower at 8.5 compared to Castr's impressive 9.6, indicating that users find Castr more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
G2 users highlight that Dacast's Analytics feature is less robust, scoring only 6.0, whereas Castr's analytics tools are praised for their depth and usability, scoring 8.4, making it easier for users to track performance metrics.
Users on G2 say that Dacast's Live Rewind feature is beneficial for viewers wanting to catch up on missed moments, but Castr's Live Chat functionality, rated at 7.7, could be improved for better audience interaction.
Reviewers mention that Dacast's Content Delivery Network (CDN) is built-in, providing a straightforward setup, while Castr offers more flexibility with CDN Integrations, allowing users to choose their preferred delivery method.
Users say that Dacast's entry-level price of $39/month is higher than Castr's competitive $12.50, making Castr a more attractive option for small businesses looking to minimize costs while still accessing essential features.
Hi David, Thank you for your message. We would love to help you with your project! I invite you to test for free our platform so you can experiment with how...Read more
What is the function of broadcast software?
1 Comment
SR
User end broadcast software is software that takes a video signal from a camera or other input device and encodes it into a stream sent over the internet to...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.