Users report that Azure Translator Text API excels in real-time translation capabilities, with a score of 7.1, while DeepL shines with a significantly higher score of 8.9, indicating a more robust performance in this area.
Reviewers mention that DeepL offers a free tier, which is appealing for small businesses, while Azure Translator Text API does not have a free offering, making it less accessible for users looking to try before they buy.
G2 users highlight that DeepL's ease of setup is rated at 9.3, compared to Azure Translator Text API's 8.5, suggesting that users find DeepL more user-friendly when getting started.
Users on G2 report that Azure Translator Text API has a strong focus on machine and human translation, scoring 8.5, while DeepL outperforms with a score of 8.9, indicating a better integration of these translation methods.
Reviewers say that while Azure Translator Text API has a solid quality of support rated at 8.8, DeepL's support is perceived as less effective with a score of 8.1, suggesting that users may find more reliable assistance with Azure.
Users report that Azure Translator Text API has a higher product direction score of 9.5, indicating a positive outlook for future updates and features, while DeepL's score of 7.8 suggests some concerns about its future development trajectory.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.