Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Cosmos DB and Ninox 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
AwareIM
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (84.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
€11.00 1 licence Per Month
Azure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(68)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cosmos DBNinox
Star Rating
(360)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (84.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
€11.00 1 licence Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Ninox excels in its Ease of Use with a score of 8.6, making it particularly appealing for small businesses looking for a straightforward solution. In contrast, Azure Cosmos DB, while powerful, has a slightly lower ease of use rating at 8.6, which may pose a challenge for less technical users.
- Reviewers mention that Ninox's Quality of Support is highly rated at 9.1, indicating a strong customer service experience. Azure Cosmos DB, with a score of 8.6, still offers good support but may not match the personalized assistance that Ninox users often highlight.
- G2 users note that Ninox's Application Templates score of 7.5 provides a solid foundation for users to build upon, while Azure Cosmos DB's higher score of 8.9 in Application Deployment suggests it offers more robust deployment options for complex applications.
- Users on G2 report that Ninox's Data Management features, particularly its Data Model score of 8.3, are user-friendly for small businesses. In contrast, Azure Cosmos DB shines with a Data Replication score of 8.3, which is crucial for enterprises needing high availability and disaster recovery.
- Reviewers mention that Ninox's Workflow Management score of 8.6 is beneficial for users looking to automate processes easily. However, Azure Cosmos DB's Scalability score of 8.9 indicates it is better suited for businesses anticipating rapid growth and needing to handle large volumes of data.
- Users say that Ninox's Customization Options, particularly in Customized Branding with a score of 6.8, may not meet the needs of all users. In contrast, Azure Cosmos DB offers a more flexible environment for developers, as indicated by its higher scores in Programming Code Extending and UI Code Extending, both at 7.5.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableNinox
Starter
€11.00
1 licence Per Month
Professionally and reliably create and share your own small-scale standard apps
- Public Cloud
- Unlimited workspaces, databases, tables
- Automatic backups
Free Trial
Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableNinox
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
48
8.9
287
Ease of Use
8.2
48
8.6
290
Ease of Setup
8.0
22
8.8
212
Ease of Admin
7.7
23
8.7
207
Quality of Support
8.2
46
9.1
264
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
22
9.0
196
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
47
9.2
288
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.8
41
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.7
41
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
32
|
Verified
Automation
Not enough data
8.4
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Development
Not enough data
8.1
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
38
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
30
|
Verified
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Availability
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Performance
6.7
6
Not enough data
Security
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
7.5
28
Not enough data
7.5
31
Not enough data
6.7
30
Not enough data
7.4
32
Not enough data
7.8
30
Data Control
Not enough data
7.6
31
Not enough data
8.1
32
Not enough data
8.4
29
Publishing
Not enough data
8.3
31
Not enough data
8.3
30
Not enough data
8.2
25
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Interface Design
Not enough data
8.2
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.1
55
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
55
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
57
|
Verified
Data Control
Not enough data
8.5
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
62
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
58
|
Verified
Publishing
Not enough data
8.8
52
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
55
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
45
|
Verified
Agentic AI - No-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.6
16
8.3
40
7.8
15
Feature Not Available
8.3
15
8.3
31
7.2
9
Feature Not Available
8.7
15
8.5
24
Database Administration
8.4
15
8.0
31
7.6
9
8.0
28
7.1
8
7.9
29
Availability
8.9
16
8.3
34
8.3
16
8.8
39
8.4
15
8.3
37
8.6
16
8.1
35
Security
7.2
6
7.9
11
7.2
6
7.2
15
5.6
6
Feature Not Available
Data Management
8.1
7
8.3
10
7.4
7
Feature Not Available
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Cosmos DB and Ninox are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Azure Cosmos DB is categorized as Key Value Databases, Document Databases, Graph Databases, and Columnar Databases
Ninox is categorized as Workplace Innovation Platforms, No-Code Development Platforms, Desktop Database, and Low-Code Development Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Ninox
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
20.3%
Internet
8.5%
Retail
5.1%
Gambling & Casinos
3.4%
Other
39.0%
Education Management
6.7%
Construction
5.5%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.5%
Information Technology and Services
4.2%
Arts and Crafts
3.3%
Other
75.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
I would like to integrate invoicing with FreeAgent?
1 Comment
SS
Hi Joanna,
Please join our API Integrations Workshop to get one-on-one help from our API experts,
https://ninoxdb.de/en/webinar
Regards,
Ninox TeamRead more
I want NINOX to integrate live with Numbers and Mail and maybe DEVONThink.
1 Comment
SS
Hi Magnus,
Ninox already supports integration with 3rd party applications via its own Native API, https://ninoxdb.de/en/manual/api/api-introduction as...Read more
Is there a more recent up to date reference guide other than the support manual?
1 Comment
JH
Yes. there is the manual at Ninox as but I understand you are looking for than that. There also is a Ninox Premium Partner called Nioxus.com
They have two...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
