Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Autodesk Alias and SOLIDWORKS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (55.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Autodesk Alias
Star Rating
(58)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (55.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Autodesk AliasSOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(620)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS excels in ease of use with a score of 8.6, making it more accessible for beginners compared to Autodesk Alias, which has a lower score of 5.6. Reviewers mention that the intuitive interface and robust tutorials in SOLIDWORKS significantly enhance the learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS offers superior CAD-CAM compatibility with a score of 8.8, while Autodesk Alias falls short in this area. Users on G2 highlight the seamless integration of CAD data into CAM workflows in SOLIDWORKS, which is crucial for manufacturing processes.
- G2 users say that SOLIDWORKS shines in 3D/solid modeling tools, scoring an impressive 9.7, whereas Autodesk Alias scores 9.1. Reviewers mention that the advanced features in SOLIDWORKS, such as parametric modeling and assembly design, provide a more comprehensive modeling experience.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS has a more extensive library of components, scoring 7.9, compared to Autodesk Alias. Reviewers mention that the ability to categorize and search for components efficiently in SOLIDWORKS saves significant time during the design process.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS has a higher quality of support with a score of 8.1, while Autodesk Alias scores only 6.7. Users on G2 appreciate the responsive customer service and extensive online resources available for SOLIDWORKS users.
- Users say that SOLIDWORKS provides better file interoperability with a score of 8.0, compared to Autodesk Alias. Reviewers highlight the ease of importing and exporting various file formats in SOLIDWORKS, which is essential for collaboration across different platforms.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Autodesk Alias
No pricing availableSOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableFree Trial
Autodesk Alias
No trial information availableSOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.1
56
8.8
516
Ease of Use
5.6
56
8.6
520
Ease of Setup
7.3
5
8.2
92
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
46
Quality of Support
6.7
44
8.1
457
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
46
Product Direction (% positive)
6.5
56
8.6
511
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.9
41
CNC Programming
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.4
36
Machining
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Design
Not enough data
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.3
95
Not enough data
8.1
95
Edit
Not enough data
8.5
94
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
9.3
94
Not enough data
8.3
82
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.6
91
Not enough data
9.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
87
Library
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.6
22
CAD
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.0
28
Integration
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
9.6
27
Not enough data
8.5
23
Data
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.1
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Logistics
Not enough data
9.1
25
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.4
51
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
58
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
57
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.7
47
Not enough data
8.6
52
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
6.1
19
Not enough data
6.1
19
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
Not enough data
8.8
43
Not enough data
9.1
42
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
9.3
43
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.2
40
Tools
Not enough data
9.4
42
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
9.2
42
Design
Not enough data
9.4
42
Design
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
7.7
11
Tools
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Library
Not enough data
8.1
12
Platform
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.9
11
Customization
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Design
Not enough data
9.2
59
Not enough data
9.0
59
Not enough data
8.8
59
Not enough data
7.6
58
Tools
Not enough data
7.9
52
Not enough data
7.9
54
Not enough data
7.3
47
Work
Not enough data
7.5
40
Not enough data
7.8
41
Not enough data
8.2
48
Not enough data
8.1
43
Not enough data
8.4
46
Environment
Not enough data
8.3
52
Not enough data
8.4
50
Not enough data
8.2
48
Not enough data
8.6
52
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
7.8
25
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
8.2
22
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Autodesk Alias and SOLIDWORKS are categorized as General-Purpose CAD
Unique Categories
Autodesk Alias has no unique categories
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), Simulation & CAE, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Autodesk Alias
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Design
42.1%
Automotive
22.8%
Higher Education
12.3%
Think Tanks
1.8%
Sports
1.8%
Other
19.3%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.7%
Design
12.1%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.0%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Autodesk Alias has no discussions with answers
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
YP
SOLIDWORKS IS USED FOR MULTIPLE WORK LIKE 2D & 3D CAD MODELING, ASSEMBLY MODELING, SHWWET METAL MODELING, SURFACE MODELING, RENDERING, SIMULATION, 3D...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
