Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ActiveBatch and RunMyJobs 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
SFTP To Go
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RunMyJobs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (73.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Contact Us
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(216)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatchRunMyJobs
Star Rating
(134)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (73.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about RunMyJobsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Redwood Software excels in "Job Scheduling" with a score of 9.7, highlighting its intuitive interface and robust scheduling capabilities, while ActiveBatch Workload Automation follows closely with a score of 9.6, praised for its flexibility in scheduling tasks.
- Reviewers mention that Redwood's "Ease of Use" is rated at 9.2, making it user-friendly for teams, whereas ActiveBatch's score of 8.8 indicates some users find it slightly more complex to navigate, particularly during initial setup.
- G2 users highlight Redwood's superior "Error Alerts" feature, scoring 9.4, which provides timely notifications for workflow issues, while ActiveBatch's score of 9.0 suggests it also offers alerts but may lack some customization options that users desire.
- Users on G2 note that Redwood's "Quality of Support" is rated at 9.2, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, compared to ActiveBatch's score of 8.9, where some users have reported longer wait times for assistance.
- Reviewers mention that both products score equally in "Scalability" at 9.1, but users of Redwood Software appreciate its seamless scaling capabilities during peak demand, while ActiveBatch users have noted some limitations in scaling for very large enterprises.
- Users say that Redwood's "Multi-platform support" is rated at 9.3, allowing for diverse integrations, while ActiveBatch's slightly lower score indicates it may not support as many platforms, which could be a consideration for businesses with varied IT environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
- Ease of use - connect to your entire tech stack with our low-code API adapter and no-code connectors for SQL Server, SharePoint, Informatica, ServiceNow, VMware and more.
- Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, change management, auto-remediation and a complete managed transfer file suite.
- Monitoring, alerting and reporting - reduce time troubleshooting and manage dependencies better with flexible and customizable monitoring and alerting.
RunMyJobs
Consumption-Based Pricing
Contact Us
With Redwood you pay only for the execution of automated processes—not process definitions. Our simple, service-based pricing eliminates unnecessary licensing and
infrastructure costs.
The usage for Redwood's technology is calculated according to the number of process executions (jobs) that are completed by the service in the production and non-production
environments. It doesn’t matter how many different platforms you use to keep your day-to-day operations running – it’s all included in our fixed platform fee.
This means that complex system development and QA testing is easy to plan and implement. It also makes it more practical to configure connections to rarely used systems that run very
few processes.
- Unlimited connections - connect to any service, application or server. Grow and deploy whenever you need.
- Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, specialized IT and finance capabilities, and an extensive library of ready-to-use integrations and pre-built processes.
- Full SaaS Implementation - delivers guaranteed uptime and 24×7 support.
Free Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
RunMyJobs
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
166
9.2
94
Ease of Use
8.9
164
9.1
95
Ease of Setup
8.4
115
8.8
87
Ease of Admin
8.7
101
9.2
87
Quality of Support
8.9
158
9.1
96
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
99
9.3
87
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
153
9.0
94
Features by Category
Automation
9.3
99
9.4
77
9.0
94
9.1
74
9.1
57
8.7
60
Administration
8.9
98
9.0
78
9.2
91
9.0
75
8.9
75
8.7
71
9.0
55
9.0
59
9.1
60
9.3
66
9.1
52
9.2
62
Functionality
9.5
103
9.7
79
8.8
80
8.4
65
9.0
53
8.5
63
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
6.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Delivery
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
Governance
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
9.2
12
Reporting
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
9.1
13
Closing Process
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
9.0
10
AI - Financial Close
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
18
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch and RunMyJobs are categorized as Workload Automation and Process Orchestration
Unique Categories
ActiveBatch is categorized as Data Warehouse Automation and Managed File Transfer (MFT)
RunMyJobs is categorized as Financial Close and SAP Store
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
RunMyJobs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
17.8%
Financial Services
17.3%
Hospital & Health Care
7.5%
Insurance
6.5%
Banking
6.1%
Other
44.9%
Computer Software
14.6%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.9%
Utilities
5.4%
Chemicals
5.4%
Other
57.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
What is Redwood automation?
2 Comments
NB
It is a batch job automation with much more capabilities. One can schedule n number of batch jobs using this tool. It can be SAP or non SAP like application...Read more
RunMyJobs has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
