Compare ActiveBatch and RunMyJobs 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (73.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Contact Us
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(226)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatchRunMyJobs
Star Rating
(314)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (73.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about RunMyJobsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that RunMyJobs excels in user experience, with many praising its clean and intuitive interface. Users have noted how easy it is to navigate, even for newcomers, which significantly enhances day-to-day task management.
- Users say that RunMyJobs provides a seamless implementation process, with feedback highlighting how it effectively handles complex scheduling needs without requiring constant script modifications. This flexibility is particularly appreciated during critical periods like financial year-end closing.
- Reviewers mention that ActiveBatch offers strong automation capabilities, especially with its RPA features, which help streamline repetitive tasks. Users involved in online sales have found it reliable for automating order processing, making it a valuable tool for operational efficiency.
- According to verified reviews, RunMyJobs stands out for its proactive monitoring features, allowing users to wake up to clean dashboards instead of worrying about job failures. This capability has been described as a significant stress reliever for many users.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while ActiveBatch has made strides in usability and speed, it still faces challenges in certain areas like workflow management. Users have noted that while it can streamline components into manageable jobs, it may not always meet the specific needs of complex workflows.
- Users report that both products provide solid support, but RunMyJobs has a slight edge in quality, with reviewers appreciating its responsiveness and helpfulness. This is reflected in the higher satisfaction scores, indicating a more favorable experience overall.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
- Ease of use - connect to your entire tech stack with our low-code API adapter and no-code connectors for SQL Server, SharePoint, Informatica, ServiceNow, VMware and more.
- Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, change management, auto-remediation and a complete managed transfer file suite.
- Monitoring, alerting and reporting - reduce time troubleshooting and manage dependencies better with flexible and customizable monitoring and alerting.
RunMyJobs
Consumption-Based Pricing
Contact Us
With Redwood you pay only for the execution of automated processes—not process definitions. Our simple, service-based pricing eliminates unnecessary licensing and
infrastructure costs.
The usage for Redwood's technology is calculated according to the number of process executions (jobs) that are completed by the service in the production and non-production
environments. It doesn’t matter how many different platforms you use to keep your day-to-day operations running – it’s all included in our fixed platform fee.
This means that complex system development and QA testing is easy to plan and implement. It also makes it more practical to configure connections to rarely used systems that run very
few processes.
- Unlimited connections - connect to any service, application or server. Grow and deploy whenever you need.
- Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, specialized IT and finance capabilities, and an extensive library of ready-to-use integrations and pre-built processes.
- Full SaaS Implementation - delivers guaranteed uptime and 24×7 support.
Free Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
RunMyJobs
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
176
9.5
255
Ease of Use
8.9
174
9.5
261
Ease of Setup
8.4
125
9.4
252
Ease of Admin
8.7
103
9.5
155
Quality of Support
8.9
168
9.4
255
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
101
9.5
154
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
163
9.2
256
Features by Category
Automation
9.4
103
9.5
108
9.0
95
9.4
114
9.1
56
8.9
82
Administration
8.8
100
8.1
165
9.1
98
9.2
136
8.9
77
9.2
118
9.0
55
9.2
74
9.1
62
9.6
144
9.1
53
9.3
77
Functionality
9.6
113
9.8
192
8.8
84
8.7
111
9.1
57
8.8
107
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
8.9
12
9.2
50
7.4
9
8.9
21
9.5
10
9.5
48
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
8.0
9
Data Delivery
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
35
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
Governance
8.9
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
35
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.9
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.3
15
Not enough data
9.2
16
Not enough data
9.2
13
Reporting
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
9.2
14
Closing Process
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
9.0
10
AI - Financial Close
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
Functionality
8.7
19
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.2
22
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.8
7
9.7
6
9.0
8
9.7
5
7.2
6
Not enough data
7.3
5
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch and RunMyJobs are categorized as Workload Automation and Process Orchestration
Unique Categories
ActiveBatch is categorized as Data Warehouse Automation and Managed File Transfer (MFT)
RunMyJobs is categorized as Financial Close and SAP Store
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
RunMyJobs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.8%
Financial Services
16.5%
Hospital & Health Care
7.1%
Insurance
6.3%
Banking
5.8%
Other
45.5%
Information Technology and Services
42.0%
Computer Software
7.5%
Automotive
4.1%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
3.7%
Telecommunications
3.1%
Other
39.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
What is Redwood automation?
2 Comments
VK
Redwood Automation is a workload Automation tool, that can help organisation to schedule workload basically in the form of job or chain on SAP NW or Java no...Read more
RunMyJobs has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
or continue with
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy