Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Pricing Overview

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Pricing Key Insights

Last updated on Jul 01, 2026


Greenlight Guru Quality Management System offers 5 pricing editions, with pricing details available directly from the vendor. Review the Greenlight Guru Quality Management System pricing table below to determine which features best align with your requirements. Contact Greenlight Guru directly to purchase the software.


Quality — Contact Us
Product Development — Contact Us
Software Development — Contact Us
Quality Events — Contact Us
Medical Device Consultant Services — Contact Us
Rated 4.5 / 5

*Pricing information is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations must be conducted with the seller.

Download complete pricing listDownload Download now

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Pricing FAQs

Generated using AI
Is Greenlight Guru Quality Management System free, or does it offer a free trial?

No. According to G2 data, Greenlight Guru Quality Management System does not offer a free plan or free trial. Users need to purchase a paid plan to access the product. Visit the seller's official pricing page for current pricing details and plan options.

Who is Greenlight Guru Quality Management System pricing best suited for?

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System's pricing is best suited for small to mid-sized medical device companies, particularly startups and growing teams seeking ISO 13485 and FDA QSR compliance without extensive IT infrastructure. The overwhelming majority of G2 reviewers come from small businesses in the medical device industry, praising how Greenlight Guru Quality Management System enables lean quality teams to manage documentation, design controls, and training efficiently. Mid-market medical device companies also appear in G2 reviews, valuing the scalable module structure. G2 reviewers from software and consulting firms additionally find value in the system, though some note the per-user pricing model can become costly as organizations scale headcount.

What are the key differences between the free and paid versions of Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System does not offer a free version or free tier. According to G2's pricing data for Greenlight Guru Quality Management System, all five tiers, including Quality, Product Development, Software Development, Quality Events, and Medical Device Consultant Services, require contacting the vendor for custom pricing. The Quality tier serves as the foundational entry point, covering document management, change management, training, supplier, and parts management. Higher tiers unlock specialized capabilities such as design controls, risk management, software release management, SBOM management, and CAPA workflows. G2 reviewers note that modular pricing allows companies to adopt relevant tiers incrementally rather than purchasing the full suite immediately.

Is Greenlight Guru Quality Management System considered good value for its pricing?

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System is widely regarded as a premium investment that delivers strong value for medical device companies, particularly small businesses and startups. G2 reviewers consistently rate it 4.5 out of 5, with many noting that the compliance-ready workflows, pre-written SOP templates, and exceptional customer support justify the cost. Several G2 users acknowledge the pricing is on the higher end, with one reviewer noting it discourages expanding user licenses, and another citing it as a barrier for pre-validation startups. However, the recurring sentiment across G2 reviews is that the time saved on QMS administration, audit readiness, and regulatory compliance outweighs the subscription cost, especially for lean teams.

Greenlight Guru Quality... Pricing Reviews

(2)
Verified User in Medical Devices
AM
Verified User in Medical Devices
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Easy Linking of Changes, NCMs, and Audits Makes Quality History Clear"
5/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

Linking changes, NCMs, and audits makes our quality history easy to follow . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

It is another system to use outside our other ERP products. The price of Greenlight discourages me from trying to get all our staff accounts to view work instructions, so I end up using a separate system for that. But the medical product focus and easy linking outweighs that problem just enough. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Medical Devices
UM
Verified User in Medical Devices
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Modern All-in-One QMS with Smart Document Versioning and Responsive Support"
4/5
What do you like best about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

I like having all/most of the aspects of the QMS in one place. The User Interface is attractive and looks professional/modern. Especially compared to some other eQMS' I've seen when visiting supplier's sites.

The ability to modify notifications is helpful and ensures you don't get hundreds of irrelevant emails flooding your inbox.

Having all the documents in one module and having a clear version system in place ensures that we have a much lower risk of using outdated documentation. I like the new(ish) smart feature where GG document module shows you the difference between new versions of documents and the previous version of the document using AI (by showing both documents side-by-side and highlighting what has changed and what has been removed). This makes checking updated documents and training on new documents much easier.

The supplier module is good and allows me to control the suppliers and their certificates/surveys/agreements in one place, with reminders for when certificates expire or when a supplier assessment is due.

Performance is good generally with little down-time.

Support is good from the team at GG. They always get back to you promptly and then check afterwards if the issue is solved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Greenlight Guru Quality Management System?

The new beta documents workspace is a downgrade on the old one.

- The main area of the screen that shows the list of documents seems a lot smaller in the beta workspace than the old workspace. I’m not sure why it needs the ‘Show 25, 1-25 of 19145’ bit at the very top (this reduces the size of the window showing documents massively and makes it feel very cramped – especially on a laptop).

- In the updated document workspace, when you hover over a document title, it moves the title to the right to show you the ‘favourite’ star. Much preferred the old version where the document titles stayed still and didn’t dance around.

- In the old version, I could use my keyboard arrows to scroll up and down the list of documents. I can’t do this in the updated version.

- The left portion of the documents workspace (with the favourites list) is now bigger (wider) than it was. This is unnecessary and makes the main document section look even more cramped. There is a ‘re-size’ drag tool, but it only allows you to make this column even bigger, not smaller…

The audit workspace is a copy of the non-conformance workspace, which means audits have to be shoehorned into tabs that don't really make sense. The tabs do not reflect an audit process. It would be better if there was a tab for audit plan, a tab for audit report, a tab for auditee's response etc.

The linking in the document workspace is clunky (in the 'related items' section of a document). When you search for a document to link to (e.g. by writing a batch number in the search box), it tends to bring up hundreds of 'Tasks' to link to, rather than documents. You can then end up hunting through many tasks before finding the relevant document you’re searching for. I can't think of any reason I would want to link to a task.

The supplier module could be improved by having a section to add their address(es) in the main summary (e.g. primary site address, secondary site address etc) and also supplier staff’s job titles (which just have to be put in the notes now).

On the Approved supplier list (ASL), you can adjust the width of the columns, but only in a very limited way (e.g. In the column for the supplier ID, the supplier ID’s would have to go up to about SPRL-1000000000 to fill up the column width which GG mandates). This width should be fully customisable as it is in most other software. And you can’t customize the order of the columns either.

- Similarly the columns in the document workspace should be more customisable/modifiable.

The reminder column in the ASL is especially annoying as it takes up about a third of the page because it has the time on there. The time is completely unnecessary for the ASL as ISO certificates don’t expire at a certain time, supplier assessments don’t need to be done at a certain time. I can’t think of any supplier action that needs to be done at a certain time. There should be the option to remove the time requirements.

The document search function is relatively poor/outdated, especially if you use more than one word in the search box. e.g. If I search for ‘Hart’, then update my search for ‘Hart Certificate’, it should narrow the search down (to documents that have both Hart AND Certificate associated with them), but for some reason if you do that now, GG seems to search for all the documents that say ‘Hart’ in and all the documents that say ‘certificate’ in, so you get double the number of search results. You end up having to play a game of 'which relevant search word is the least used in our document database that I can use to try and find the document I'm looking for'.

It is frustrating having the American date format forced on us, with no option to change it. Dates should be formatted day-month-year, rather than month-day-year. It's annoying having to decipher e.g. "Mon Jan 31 2026" every time. This applies to the supplier area (under due dates for reminders) and the documents space (under effective dates), and possibly elsewhere.

- The date formatting also leads to issues when uploading spreadsheets. When we have a date in the document, the document preview page displays the date as the American format. When you download the document, it displays in Excel as the correct English date format. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Greenlight Guru Quality Management System Comparisons