What do you like best about Channel.me Cobrowsing?
What I like best about Channel.me Cobrowsing
Ease of Use: The interface is clean and extremely intuitive—for both agents and customers. Sessions launch quickly, and navigation feels natural. Agents can start co-browsing with minimal clicks, and customers don't need to install or download anything.
Ease of Implementation: Very straightforward. It only requires inserting a JavaScript snippet into your site. If you use Google Tag Manager, setup is even easier. You can get it up and running in less than a day without needing deep technical support.
Ease of Integration: It integrates well into most websites and can be customized to only activate on specific pages. Also, it supports integration with analytics tools like Google Analytics, and can work alongside existing live chat platforms.
Customer Support: Support is helpful, but not always fast. During implementation or troubleshooting, response times could be improved. However, the documentation is clear enough to solve most common issues.
Frequency of Use: It's something you'd use frequently if your team provides web-based support or onboarding. Ideal for sales, customer service, or technical troubleshooting teams dealing with customers stuck in complex web flows.
Number of Features: It’s not overloaded, which is a good thing—it focuses on doing one job well. Features like sticky notes, field masking, view-only vs. control modes, and session recording hit the right balance between power and simplicity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Channel.me Cobrowsing?
What I dislike about Channel.me Cobrowsing
Ease of Use: While it’s generally intuitive, the experience can become less smooth if the website has complex dynamic content—certain interactive elements may not always reflect properly on both sides of the session without fine-tuning.
Ease of Implementation: Initial setup is easy in most cases, but advanced use cases (like custom page rules, dynamic content, or SPA support) require developer involvement and deeper configuration. The default install isn’t always plug-and-play for modern frameworks.
Customer Support: The support team is knowledgeable but not consistently responsive. In our experience, responses to technical questions during implementation or troubleshooting sometimes took longer than expected, especially outside core business hours.
Frequency of Use: Usage may be limited to specific customer types (e.g., those struggling with onboarding or checkout), so it's not necessarily used across every support interaction unless the business model heavily depends on website guidance.
Number of Features: While the core feature set is strong, the tool is quite focused—there aren’t many advanced features beyond co-browsing and sticky notes. If you're looking for screen sharing, video support, or deeper CRM/chat integrations, you might feel restricted.
Ease of Integration: Integration with basic websites is smooth, but more complex platforms—especially single-page apps—may need additional dev work or custom event tracking to get everything working reliably. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.