What do you like best about Subsplash?
Message video archive is pretty nice - we've been using it for about 6 years or so. I like that it can be embedded on our site and that users can search for key topics/passages, etc. Could use more functionality though - more flexible embed options.
We're also using their Mobile App tool. Some of the features on there are nice - embedding the iCal feed, and utilizing their own message archive.
Haven't gotten to preview their streaming service yet - our tech guy is setting all of that up this week. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Subsplash?
I see lots of room for improvement.
Connection to the dashboard is often very slow and the dashboard site has been down enough in the last year that it doesn't make me sure about their ability to provide consistent service. The dashboard takes a while to come up in general and it's not because our internet connection is slow. I'm not sure what that issue is.
Message video library could use more embed options for those of us who don't use SnapPages.
Mobile App could also use more options for those who don't use SP's giving or SnapPages. We should be able to build app pages vs having to move our webhosting. I'm probably just not aware of my options in this - someone, let me know if I'm thinking of any of this wrongly? I could really use some pointers.
Just launched our mobile app through SP but I am struggling with its lack of functional integrations [we use ACS Realm for giving] and although the subscription price is kinda steep, the options don't seem beefy. I'm very happy with our current website host and mobile site so SnapPages isn't really an option, but I don't want the whole app to kick users out of the app and to our mobile site vs keeping them in the app. Even if our mobile app is extraneous, I don't want it to feel like it is.
I know SP is a company that's goal is to make money, but trying to force each client to pay for all of their services so that the mobile app will be fully functional instead of allowing us to integrate services we already use seems to pigeonhole us instead of allowing SP to reach a broader client base. Is embedding our own services [pages or giving service] through integrations not acceptable because of app guidelines? I probably just don't understand but there aren't clear answers on the help site about this.
With the intense dislike of SP's back end UI that I've developed while putting the mobile app together, I'm not inclined to move our web hosting and so that makes creating a useful mobile app harder to create. I am on this site today cause I'm trying to decide if I should pay for yet another website host service [snappages] so that the app would be more viable and not so extraneous, but I still don't think we should have to adopt SP's giving tool if we already have one that's working fine - one that we cannot/will not be able to get rid of. Maybe the ability to send givers to our giving app would be nice - they could choose whether or not they open the link in the app or the mobile site as a security measure...
I like our mobile site very much and wish there was a way to create an app from that instead of doing it this way. I don't know enough about apps yet to create a workaround but from what I can tell, the only workaround there is for the SP mobile app tool is to purchase more of the SP tools and if all of those are as restrictive as the design options I've found when populating the mobile app... yeah, not leaning in that direction. Leaning more towards finding a company that can help me integrate all of our miscellaneous pieces. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.