Compare QAComplete and Tricentis qTest

At a Glance
QAComplete
QAComplete
Star Rating
(15)3.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$999 each year per concurrent user
Browse all 2 pricing plans
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Star Rating
(101)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Tricentis qTest
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that Tricentis qTest excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall rating compared to QAComplete. Users appreciate its ability to centralize test management and provide seamless integration with tools like Jira, which enhances collaboration between QA and development teams.
  • According to verified reviews, Tricentis qTest stands out for its ease of use, with users highlighting the straightforward process of creating and executing test cases. This efficiency is further emphasized by feedback on its capability to reuse test cases, saving time and improving quality during deployments.
  • Users say that QAComplete offers flexibility and guidance, making it a viable option for teams looking for a tool that can adapt to various testing needs. However, some reviewers note that it may not match the intuitive experience provided by Tricentis qTest, particularly in terms of test management.
  • Reviewers mention that Tricentis qTest's integration capabilities are a major advantage, allowing for real-time visibility into test execution and defects. This feature is crucial for teams aiming to maintain alignment throughout the development process, a point that users frequently highlight.
  • G2 reviewers indicate that while QAComplete has its strengths, such as providing accurate comparisons of test results, it falls short in overall user satisfaction and support quality compared to Tricentis qTest. Users have expressed a desire for improved support experiences with QAComplete.
  • According to recent user feedback, Tricentis qTest is praised for its robust test case management features, allowing users to create multiple test suites and cycles efficiently. This capability is a significant factor in its higher ratings, as it directly impacts daily usability for testing teams.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
QAComplete
On-Premises
$999
each year per concurrent user
Browse all 2 pricing plans
Tricentis qTest
No pricing available
Free Trial
QAComplete
No trial information available
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
14
8.4
73
Ease of Use
7.7
14
8.4
75
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.0
39
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
21
Quality of Support
7.1
13
8.4
71
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
22
Product Direction (% positive)
7.5
14
9.1
81
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.3
31
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
8.1
30
Not enough data
8.5
28
Management
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.2
27
Not enough data
8.1
26
Not enough data
8.9
16
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
9.2
15
Automation
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.5
11
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
QAComplete
QAComplete
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
QAComplete and Tricentis qTest are categorized as Software Testing and Test Management
Unique Categories
QAComplete
QAComplete has no unique categories
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest is categorized as Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
QAComplete
QAComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
33.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
40.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
26.7%
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
26.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
46.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
26.8%
Reviewers' Industry
QAComplete
QAComplete
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Hospital & Health Care
13.3%
Computer Software
13.3%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Staffing and Recruiting
6.7%
Other
46.7%
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Information Technology and Services
26.8%
Computer Software
23.7%
Financial Services
7.2%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
4.1%
Other
33.0%
Alternatives
QAComplete
QAComplete Alternatives
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Tuskr
Tuskr
Add Tuskr
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application...
Add OpenText Application Quality Management
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
QMetry Test Management
QMetry Test Management
Add QMetry Test Management
Discussions
QAComplete
QAComplete Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
QAComplete has no discussions with answers
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Discussions
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options. See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board. Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more