Compare Postman and QAComplete 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
$999 each year per concurrent user
Postman
Star Rating
(1,733)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansQAComplete
Star Rating
(15)3.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$999 each year per concurrent user
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Postman excels in user experience, with many users praising its intuitive interface that makes API testing and development straightforward, even for beginners. In contrast, QAComplete has received mixed feedback regarding its usability, with some users noting challenges in configuration and workflow alignment.
- Users say that Postman offers robust scripting capabilities that enhance its functionality, allowing for complex request chaining and automated testing. This feature is highlighted as a significant advantage over QAComplete, which, while praised for its flexibility and guidance, does not match the automation depth that Postman provides.
- Reviewers mention that Postman’s quick implementation process is a standout feature, with many users appreciating how easy it is to get started. On the other hand, QAComplete has fewer recent reviews, indicating potential challenges in its setup and onboarding experience, which may not be as seamless.
- According to verified reviews, Postman has a much larger user base and a higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting its strong market presence and user trust. QAComplete, while serving a similar mid-market segment, has significantly fewer reviews, which may limit the reliability of its user feedback.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Postman’s ability to quickly send requests and test different endpoints is a major time-saver, making it a preferred choice for developers. In comparison, QAComplete is noted for its capabilities in managing testing cycles and delivering high-quality products, but it may not be as efficient for rapid API testing.
- Users report that Postman’s quality of support is generally higher, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. QAComplete, while offering decent support, has received lower ratings in this area, suggesting that users may experience more challenges when seeking assistance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Postman
Free Plan
Free
For individuals or a small team of 3 or less to start testing APIs.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
QAComplete
On-Premises
$999
each year per concurrent user
On-Premise (You Host)
Free Trial
Postman
Free Trial is available
QAComplete
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,356
8.1
14
Ease of Use
9.2
1,374
7.7
14
Ease of Setup
9.3
620
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.0
189
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
1,126
7.1
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
161
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
1,314
7.5
14
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Management
8.8
131
Not enough data
9.1
133
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.8
125
Not enough data
Security Testing
8.6
124
Not enough data
9.4
129
Not enough data
9.5
135
Not enough data
Security Management
8.8
121
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
7.9
120
Not enough data
Development
9.5
562
Not enough data
8.7
499
Not enough data
8.7
478
Not enough data
8.8
496
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.8
504
Not enough data
8.8
488
Not enough data
8.9
499
Not enough data
Functionality
9.4
30
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
8.9
29
Not enough data
9.5
29
Not enough data
Usability
9.0
28
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
8.9
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
8.8
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
Integration - AI Agent Builders
8.9
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
Development - API Platforms
9.6
349
Not enough data
8.8
280
Not enough data
8.8
256
Not enough data
8.8
267
Not enough data
Collaboration - API Platforms
8.9
284
Not enough data
8.8
264
Not enough data
8.6
254
Not enough data
API Management - API Platforms
9.0
265
Not enough data
8.4
259
Not enough data
8.5
254
Not enough data
8.9
267
Not enough data
8.2
251
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
8.1
167
Not enough data
8.0
163
Not enough data
8.1
164
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
9.5
836
Not enough data
8.7
709
Not enough data
8.7
649
Not enough data
8.7
358
Not enough data
API Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
754
Not enough data
8.9
723
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
632
Not enough data
Data Integration
8.8
665
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Postman and QAComplete are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Postman is categorized as Service Virtualization, API Platforms, API Development, API Security, API Management, Build Automation, and AI Agent Builders
QAComplete is categorized as Test Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Postman
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
QAComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
35.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.3%
Financial Services
3.3%
Banking
2.0%
Internet
1.8%
Other
27.3%
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Hospital & Health Care
13.3%
Computer Software
13.3%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Staffing and Recruiting
6.7%
Other
46.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Postman used for?
7 Comments
KK
Personnaly i used postman for connect multiple softwares through API.Read more
Is it possible to make such a service in the form of a Web App ?
3 Comments
VN
Hey Shrini,
We recently launched Postman on the Web feature to use on a browser. Make sure to install the Postman Agent file to bypass any CORDS...Read more
Is there any alternative?
3 Comments
LP
There exists Postwoman as an alternative:
https://postwoman.ioRead more
QAComplete has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
